<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BenQ W6000 Home Theater Projector &#8220;First Look&#8221; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on home theater projectors being reviewed, related products, and tips for users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-275013</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 06:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-275013</guid>
		<description>Hi Will, sorry for the delay, I&#039;ve been slammed, and traveling.  The w6000, like the new w7000 has very good blacks, but not quite up to the Epson 5010 or old 8700ub, but generally a touch better than the Panasonic pt-ae7000. The higher end JVC&#039;s, by comparison are well better than the Epson.  The lower priced JVC model, rs45 / X30 though, is only slightly better at blacks than the 5010...

I love great blacks. My own pj is the old JVC DLA-RS20.  I consider the benqs to be ultra high contrast, which doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s the best, but as I have written many times 1) what&#039;s acceptable is up to each person, 2) by the time you achieve this level of blacks, other factors can easily out weigh further improved blacks. You will have to make the call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Will, sorry for the delay, I&#8217;ve been slammed, and traveling.  The w6000, like the new w7000 has very good blacks, but not quite up to the Epson 5010 or old 8700ub, but generally a touch better than the Panasonic pt-ae7000. The higher end JVC&#8217;s, by comparison are well better than the Epson.  The lower priced JVC model, rs45 / X30 though, is only slightly better at blacks than the 5010&#8230;</p>
<p>I love great blacks. My own pj is the old JVC DLA-RS20.  I consider the benqs to be ultra high contrast, which doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s the best, but as I have written many times 1) what&#8217;s acceptable is up to each person, 2) by the time you achieve this level of blacks, other factors can easily out weigh further improved blacks. You will have to make the call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Hartigan</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-267402</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Hartigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-267402</guid>
		<description>Hi there. I was wondering how you would consider the w6000 black levels against some of the black levels kings like the jvc and epson models. I looked through alot of reviews and know the w6000 trails behind. The one picture that helps me the most, seems to be cropped on the w6000! The 5th element star ship. The black bars are cropped off so I can&#039;t comparison the blackness of the star field to the pitch black of the bars! I really like what I&#039;ve heard about is projector but I&#039;m weary of loosing immersion and being critical if the blacks look subpar. Especially in dark movies.

Are there any other dlp machines that better the w6000 blacks, with respectable 700ish lumen best modes? The sharp z15000 looked great if it&#039;s lumens weren&#039;t so bismal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there. I was wondering how you would consider the w6000 black levels against some of the black levels kings like the jvc and epson models. I looked through alot of reviews and know the w6000 trails behind. The one picture that helps me the most, seems to be cropped on the w6000! The 5th element star ship. The black bars are cropped off so I can&#8217;t comparison the blackness of the star field to the pitch black of the bars! I really like what I&#8217;ve heard about is projector but I&#8217;m weary of loosing immersion and being critical if the blacks look subpar. Especially in dark movies.</p>
<p>Are there any other dlp machines that better the w6000 blacks, with respectable 700ish lumen best modes? The sharp z15000 looked great if it&#8217;s lumens weren&#8217;t so bismal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-82204</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-82204</guid>
		<description>Hi Sami,  it&#039;s early for 3D, the lowest cost solution for 3D are those 720p or WXGA projectors, and then a device that will convert Blu-ray 3D/hdmi 1.4 to a 720p signal in 3D that those projectors can accept.  That way, movies, and HDTV...   The first 1080p lower cost projector that&#039;s 3D, that we get in will probably be the Sharp XV-Z17000, and that one&#039;s probably not cheap either far less than say the Sony and JVCs...   We&#039;ll be cranking out the reviews as the manufacturers make the 3D projectors available to us.. -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sami,  it&#8217;s early for 3D, the lowest cost solution for 3D are those 720p or WXGA projectors, and then a device that will convert Blu-ray 3D/hdmi 1.4 to a 720p signal in 3D that those projectors can accept.  That way, movies, and HDTV&#8230;   The first 1080p lower cost projector that&#8217;s 3D, that we get in will probably be the Sharp XV-Z17000, and that one&#8217;s probably not cheap either far less than say the Sony and JVCs&#8230;   We&#8217;ll be cranking out the reviews as the manufacturers make the 3D projectors available to us.. -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-73298</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 08:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-73298</guid>
		<description>Hi Art, 

Is the BenQ W6000 3D ready? If not, can you please advice the best 3D ready projector in the market within?

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Art, </p>
<p>Is the BenQ W6000 3D ready? If not, can you please advice the best 3D ready projector in the market within?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40131</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-40131</guid>
		<description>Well, if you don&#039;t contemplate going 3D in the next year or two, I don&#039;t really have an answer for you.  You may wish to find some forums and reviews discussing blu-ray players...  Not really our thing... (though Mike did review the Oppo Blu-ray, recently).

The PS3 is widely used, I use in both of my theaters/testing areas, and I also shelled out $400 for a new panasonic blu-ray player a few months back, for working with 3D movies on Blu-ray (1.4 hdmi required for  3D Blu-ray standard).  I haven&#039;t really compared it to the PS3 though for normal performance...

The PS3 advantage has been superb upgradability (wireless internet though your home router), and the fact that it is by far the most widely used player for Blu-ray, that you can figure that just about every new blu-ray disc to hit the market has been thoroughly tested for compatibility with the PS3 (including all those special features, BD-Live, BD 2.0, etc...

That&#039;s all I&#039;ve got for ya!  Anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you don&#8217;t contemplate going 3D in the next year or two, I don&#8217;t really have an answer for you.  You may wish to find some forums and reviews discussing blu-ray players&#8230;  Not really our thing&#8230; (though Mike did review the Oppo Blu-ray, recently).</p>
<p>The PS3 is widely used, I use in both of my theaters/testing areas, and I also shelled out $400 for a new panasonic blu-ray player a few months back, for working with 3D movies on Blu-ray (1.4 hdmi required for  3D Blu-ray standard).  I haven&#8217;t really compared it to the PS3 though for normal performance&#8230;</p>
<p>The PS3 advantage has been superb upgradability (wireless internet though your home router), and the fact that it is by far the most widely used player for Blu-ray, that you can figure that just about every new blu-ray disc to hit the market has been thoroughly tested for compatibility with the PS3 (including all those special features, BD-Live, BD 2.0, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve got for ya!  Anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dimitris</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-39876</link>
		<dc:creator>dimitris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-39876</guid>
		<description>hello to all!
i have a w6000 and i have construct a plexi box( i had from my old canon lv x6)with soundtraps,It is a little bigger from w6000 with a hall in front(for lens) and side halls(for air)and i dont hear anything!I believe w6000 is the best machine at his price.My question:what blue ray player is better to work with w6000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello to all!<br />
i have a w6000 and i have construct a plexi box( i had from my old canon lv x6)with soundtraps,It is a little bigger from w6000 with a hall in front(for lens) and side halls(for air)and i dont hear anything!I believe w6000 is the best machine at his price.My question:what blue ray player is better to work with w6000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-26344</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-26344</guid>
		<description>Yep, definitely not the quietest.  We all tend to vary in terms of what we consider acceptable noise levels.  And, as you know the room acoustics can make a problem worse.  See if the mount is resonating with the iris. If so, perhaps some spacers with sound absorbing material.  Best of luck! -a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, definitely not the quietest.  We all tend to vary in terms of what we consider acceptable noise levels.  And, as you know the room acoustics can make a problem worse.  See if the mount is resonating with the iris. If so, perhaps some spacers with sound absorbing material.  Best of luck! -a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-25333</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-25333</guid>
		<description>Shammi,

   Unless Art or someone else can correct me if I&#039;m wrong...

   153&quot; 2.35:1 screen is roughly 5ftx12ft(=60sq ft). Divide the lumens (which in Art&#039;s review was about 1100( by the screen area and you get 1100/60=18.3ftl. then take the ftl&#039;s and times it by the screen gain to get your total. 18.3*1.3=23.8. 

   So yes you will get your desired ftl. But once the bulb reaches half brightness you&#039;ll be down to about 12ftl&#039;s. Almost what you want but from what I&#039;ve read, about what most commercial cinemas are running. You could always run the bulb in eco mode and then switch to full later to maintain about the same ftl throughtout the lamp&#039;s life.

   Lastly, based on the calculator at Projectorcentral, http://www.projectorcentral.com/BenQ-W6000-projection-calculator-pro.htm your throw of 24&#039; will work and it&#039;s where Art say&#039;s he takes his lumens readings so 1100 is about what you&#039;ll get (if you use his settings and not the default). 

Hope this helps,
Billy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shammi,</p>
<p>   Unless Art or someone else can correct me if I&#8217;m wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>   153&#8243; 2.35:1 screen is roughly 5ftx12ft(=60sq ft). Divide the lumens (which in Art&#8217;s review was about 1100( by the screen area and you get 1100/60=18.3ftl. then take the ftl&#8217;s and times it by the screen gain to get your total. 18.3*1.3=23.8. </p>
<p>   So yes you will get your desired ftl. But once the bulb reaches half brightness you&#8217;ll be down to about 12ftl&#8217;s. Almost what you want but from what I&#8217;ve read, about what most commercial cinemas are running. You could always run the bulb in eco mode and then switch to full later to maintain about the same ftl throughtout the lamp&#8217;s life.</p>
<p>   Lastly, based on the calculator at Projectorcentral, <a href="http://www.projectorcentral.com/BenQ-W6000-projection-calculator-pro.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.projectorcentral.com/BenQ-W6000-projection-calculator-pro.htm</a> your throw of 24&#8242; will work and it&#8217;s where Art say&#8217;s he takes his lumens readings so 1100 is about what you&#8217;ll get (if you use his settings and not the default). </p>
<p>Hope this helps,<br />
Billy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-25096</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-25096</guid>
		<description>I bought the w6000. I am not too picky about the picture so it even looked good to me right out of the box. I bought it because I have a 12x20 room and I really wanted a projector that I can sit all the way the back where I don&#039;t see it. It worked out great but that noise is pretty loud. Especially the DI. It sounds like an old hard drive in action. I can ignore the fan noise but I have to do something about the DI. Either turn it off or put an inch or two of OC 703 (a sound absorber) under it and see how it works. If it doesn&#039;t work or looked bad, I will probably just turn it off. As I said I am not picky!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the w6000. I am not too picky about the picture so it even looked good to me right out of the box. I bought it because I have a 12&#215;20 room and I really wanted a projector that I can sit all the way the back where I don&#8217;t see it. It worked out great but that noise is pretty loud. Especially the DI. It sounds like an old hard drive in action. I can ignore the fan noise but I have to do something about the DI. Either turn it off or put an inch or two of OC 703 (a sound absorber) under it and see how it works. If it doesn&#8217;t work or looked bad, I will probably just turn it off. As I said I am not picky!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2009/09/13/benq-w6000-home-theater-projector-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-24887</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=479#comment-24887</guid>
		<description>Geoff, with the iris off, black levels will probably perform more like the Mitsubishi HC3800.  I&#039;d stick with the BenQ.  If the iris noise does bother you, you can always build a sort of padded shelf below the projector... to block the sound.  With those shelf mounting projectors, I&#039;ve suggested oversized shelves for the same reason.  perhaps a couple square feet of black foam, mounted just a couple inches below the projector?  I realize 7 foot ceilings are a challenge.  good luck! -a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, with the iris off, black levels will probably perform more like the Mitsubishi HC3800.  I&#8217;d stick with the BenQ.  If the iris noise does bother you, you can always build a sort of padded shelf below the projector&#8230; to block the sound.  With those shelf mounting projectors, I&#8217;ve suggested oversized shelves for the same reason.  perhaps a couple square feet of black foam, mounted just a couple inches below the projector?  I realize 7 foot ceilings are a challenge.  good luck! -a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
