<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Home Theater Projector Reviews and the Home Theater Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on home theater projectors being reviewed, related products, and tips for users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-247250</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-247250</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

For the price, with Lens shift, the Epson will be very tough to beat.  Sure, there&#039;s an even brighter Panasonic - the new PT-AR100U, but that&#039;s priced around $2000.  

As to gaming, I&#039;m not sure, but one of my gaming bloggers measured the 8700UB (the big brother, with better blacks - my personal fav, for under $2K if you could find one at an acceptable price.  While the Epson&#039;s aren&#039;t the fasting things around for gaming, they are apparently fast enough.  Scott S, one of my gaming bloggers, owns the 8700UB (which should perform as well as the 8350 - noting that the more dynamic features, the greater the lag time, so CFI, for example (smooth motion) also adds a fair amount of lag.  Scott S, is most pleased with it for gaming, even though even less lag would be better.  He&#039;s serious about it, builds his own superfast computers, and plays strictly PC&#039;s not consoles.   I figure if it works for someone who has spent huge amounts of hours playing games at top levels, it should work for the rest of us.

The 8350&#039;s blacks are &quot;good&quot;, but not &quot;ultra high contrast&quot; like the 8700ub (who&#039;s blacks with the iris off, are roughly comparable to the 8350 with the dynamic iris working.   That 8700UB is a step up for sure.  The thing is, they are officially discontinued.  Per a conversation with Epson, most dealers will be out in the next 30 days.  That may mean you can find a great deal, or it may mean (since it&#039;s so popular) that the few dealers that still have them, figure there will be plenty of demand.  Failing that, for the huge difference in price, the 8350 only gives up those better blacks, CFI and their dynamic sharpening:  Super-Resolution.   For me, only the black level difference is really significant, between the two, the other extra&#039;s are really minor for most.   Either should serve you well.   
The one other possibility is the now closeout on the BenQ W6000, another favorite of mine.  There you can get black levels closer to the 8700ub than the 8350, and you&#039;ll have your lens shift.  This was a $2000 - $2500 priced projector for the last year and a half, but I see one of my advertisers selling it for about $1500.  hell of a projector for $1500...   Placement issues (less zoom range, etc.) notwithstanding, I would have to buy the W6000 over the 8350, budget allowing.  BTW, the BenQ is exceptionally bright, but it&#039;s lamp lasts only about half as long as the Epson&#039;s so more cost down the road, (and it draws roughly 50% more electricity when running (for you green fanatics).  -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>For the price, with Lens shift, the Epson will be very tough to beat.  Sure, there&#8217;s an even brighter Panasonic &#8211; the new PT-AR100U, but that&#8217;s priced around $2000.  </p>
<p>As to gaming, I&#8217;m not sure, but one of my gaming bloggers measured the 8700UB (the big brother, with better blacks &#8211; my personal fav, for under $2K if you could find one at an acceptable price.  While the Epson&#8217;s aren&#8217;t the fasting things around for gaming, they are apparently fast enough.  Scott S, one of my gaming bloggers, owns the 8700UB (which should perform as well as the 8350 &#8211; noting that the more dynamic features, the greater the lag time, so CFI, for example (smooth motion) also adds a fair amount of lag.  Scott S, is most pleased with it for gaming, even though even less lag would be better.  He&#8217;s serious about it, builds his own superfast computers, and plays strictly PC&#8217;s not consoles.   I figure if it works for someone who has spent huge amounts of hours playing games at top levels, it should work for the rest of us.</p>
<p>The 8350&#8242;s blacks are &#8220;good&#8221;, but not &#8220;ultra high contrast&#8221; like the 8700ub (who&#8217;s blacks with the iris off, are roughly comparable to the 8350 with the dynamic iris working.   That 8700UB is a step up for sure.  The thing is, they are officially discontinued.  Per a conversation with Epson, most dealers will be out in the next 30 days.  That may mean you can find a great deal, or it may mean (since it&#8217;s so popular) that the few dealers that still have them, figure there will be plenty of demand.  Failing that, for the huge difference in price, the 8350 only gives up those better blacks, CFI and their dynamic sharpening:  Super-Resolution.   For me, only the black level difference is really significant, between the two, the other extra&#8217;s are really minor for most.   Either should serve you well.<br />
The one other possibility is the now closeout on the BenQ W6000, another favorite of mine.  There you can get black levels closer to the 8700ub than the 8350, and you&#8217;ll have your lens shift.  This was a $2000 &#8211; $2500 priced projector for the last year and a half, but I see one of my advertisers selling it for about $1500.  hell of a projector for $1500&#8230;   Placement issues (less zoom range, etc.) notwithstanding, I would have to buy the W6000 over the 8350, budget allowing.  BTW, the BenQ is exceptionally bright, but it&#8217;s lamp lasts only about half as long as the Epson&#8217;s so more cost down the road, (and it draws roughly 50% more electricity when running (for you green fanatics).  -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-244951</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-244951</guid>
		<description>First off, I wanted to say thank you for the site.  You guys have kept me from making a $1500 mistake right off by explaining lens shift.  

I am completely new to projectors here, outside of the one in my conference room at work, I had no knowledge of them.  But with my 46&quot; LCD TV starting to go out, and the desire to go with something bigger, when seeing price vs. price between projectors and larger TV&#039;s, it became obvious which direction I would be going.

I have finished out my basement myself, and decided on a projector at the last minute which leaves me with my hybrid entertainment room.  I was able to finish out a hole in the back wall that separates another room, and run some hdmi cables back through the walls/roof there from my entertainment corner, as well as a power outlet, so the cords will be nice and hidden.  The issue there was unless I wanted my screen at the floor, my need is something with lens shift as the ceiling at that back wall is only about 6.5&#039; high across the length of the room, vs. 8&#039; in the rest of it (ventilation runs through that little area).

My wants.  
Lens shift
&quot;good&quot; (the word is very relative) black levels.
Enough brightness I can watch something with dimmed lights, especially sports. Ambient lighting is no issue at all, no windows in this room, but paint isn&#039;t ideal on the walls (tan walls, white ceiling)
Budget of under $2000 all combined (screen plus projector)
Decent zoom features (hoping for 110 inch projected from 15&#039; away, but want the ability to adjust)
1080p for blu ray/PS3 gaming
Not having to get a new 200 dollar bulb every 3 months
Good responsiveness (heard lag on some projectors is bad when playing games)

My things I don&#039;t really care about:

3D. I am a little interested, but wife gets that queasy feeling, not worth the extra money as of now.    
Speakers/size/portability no need, got the surround sound wires in the walls, plenty of room at the mounting area.

So with that in mind, I keep seeing one name popping up here, and that is the Epson 8350, which was one of your award winners last year, and caught my attention and hasn&#039;t let it go.  I am wondering if there really is another option to think about here, or if I did convince the wife that another 500 bucks for 3d was worthy (upset at no lens shift on the 3010), what would be a few good options in your opinion based on my likes and needs that I could look further into. 

Again, I love the site, and thanks so much for the help already

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I wanted to say thank you for the site.  You guys have kept me from making a $1500 mistake right off by explaining lens shift.  </p>
<p>I am completely new to projectors here, outside of the one in my conference room at work, I had no knowledge of them.  But with my 46&#8243; LCD TV starting to go out, and the desire to go with something bigger, when seeing price vs. price between projectors and larger TV&#8217;s, it became obvious which direction I would be going.</p>
<p>I have finished out my basement myself, and decided on a projector at the last minute which leaves me with my hybrid entertainment room.  I was able to finish out a hole in the back wall that separates another room, and run some hdmi cables back through the walls/roof there from my entertainment corner, as well as a power outlet, so the cords will be nice and hidden.  The issue there was unless I wanted my screen at the floor, my need is something with lens shift as the ceiling at that back wall is only about 6.5&#8242; high across the length of the room, vs. 8&#8242; in the rest of it (ventilation runs through that little area).</p>
<p>My wants.<br />
Lens shift<br />
&#8220;good&#8221; (the word is very relative) black levels.<br />
Enough brightness I can watch something with dimmed lights, especially sports. Ambient lighting is no issue at all, no windows in this room, but paint isn&#8217;t ideal on the walls (tan walls, white ceiling)<br />
Budget of under $2000 all combined (screen plus projector)<br />
Decent zoom features (hoping for 110 inch projected from 15&#8242; away, but want the ability to adjust)<br />
1080p for blu ray/PS3 gaming<br />
Not having to get a new 200 dollar bulb every 3 months<br />
Good responsiveness (heard lag on some projectors is bad when playing games)</p>
<p>My things I don&#8217;t really care about:</p>
<p>3D. I am a little interested, but wife gets that queasy feeling, not worth the extra money as of now.<br />
Speakers/size/portability no need, got the surround sound wires in the walls, plenty of room at the mounting area.</p>
<p>So with that in mind, I keep seeing one name popping up here, and that is the Epson 8350, which was one of your award winners last year, and caught my attention and hasn&#8217;t let it go.  I am wondering if there really is another option to think about here, or if I did convince the wife that another 500 bucks for 3d was worthy (upset at no lens shift on the 3010), what would be a few good options in your opinion based on my likes and needs that I could look further into. </p>
<p>Again, I love the site, and thanks so much for the help already</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-150183</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-150183</guid>
		<description>still writing it.  The awards, and first two pages will go live sometime tomorrow (Saturday, probably evening).. -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still writing it.  The awards, and first two pages will go live sometime tomorrow (Saturday, probably evening).. -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill papadimitriou</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-149983</link>
		<dc:creator>bill papadimitriou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-149983</guid>
		<description>heelo all, has the 2011 1080p Home Theater Projector Comparison Report been uploaed as yet ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heelo all, has the 2011 1080p Home Theater Projector Comparison Report been uploaed as yet ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Rasberry</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-129479</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Rasberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-129479</guid>
		<description>Art, you are the man! Thanks for responding to my question regarding brightness and the HC7000 vs the 8700UB. I have a problem with my current projector (Sony VPL VW-100) hopefully you can give me some pointers. The original bulb lasted about 900 hrs as advertised. I purchased a new bulb ($900) and installed it. After about 100 hours on the new bulb the projector began displaying a message to &#039;replace the lens filter&#039;. I cleaned and replaced the filter to no avail. I then order a new filter from Sony and installed it. This didn&#039;t solve the issue either. I called Sony support and after a few &quot;turn it off and on&#039;s&quot; they gave me a number for a local repairman. When the repairman found out the model he informed me he only repair Sony TV&#039;s!

I have removed and reinstalled the new bulb and filter. The projector continues to ask for the filter to be replaced and then shuts off after 60 secs. I have combed the manual and talked to Sony a couple times. This has be going on for 6 months.

Any tips/solution short of the old Discount Tire (toss it through the window) would be appreciated.

P.S. the one year warranty expired 1 1/2 yrs ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art, you are the man! Thanks for responding to my question regarding brightness and the HC7000 vs the 8700UB. I have a problem with my current projector (Sony VPL VW-100) hopefully you can give me some pointers. The original bulb lasted about 900 hrs as advertised. I purchased a new bulb ($900) and installed it. After about 100 hours on the new bulb the projector began displaying a message to &#8216;replace the lens filter&#8217;. I cleaned and replaced the filter to no avail. I then order a new filter from Sony and installed it. This didn&#8217;t solve the issue either. I called Sony support and after a few &#8220;turn it off and on&#8217;s&#8221; they gave me a number for a local repairman. When the repairman found out the model he informed me he only repair Sony TV&#8217;s!</p>
<p>I have removed and reinstalled the new bulb and filter. The projector continues to ask for the filter to be replaced and then shuts off after 60 secs. I have combed the manual and talked to Sony a couple times. This has be going on for 6 months.</p>
<p>Any tips/solution short of the old Discount Tire (toss it through the window) would be appreciated.</p>
<p>P.S. the one year warranty expired 1 1/2 yrs ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-124592</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-124592</guid>
		<description>Hi Jerry,  
Assuming you don&#039;t have to sell the kids to come up with $400 - absolutely.  the short version - you get:
Brighter, Higher resolution, better blacks, a lamp that they say will last 5000 hours at full power, and a shiny new 2 year warranty on everything, plus if there is a problem, Epson ships you a replacement - the next day...    On the other hand, you fix your Panny, and only what was fixed gets a new warranty, and probably for 90 days maybe a year...    Other than finding the $400, I can&#039;t think of a good reason not to.  I can&#039;t think of anything that a PT-AE700 will do as well as an 8350.   - ok?  -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jerry,<br />
Assuming you don&#8217;t have to sell the kids to come up with $400 &#8211; absolutely.  the short version &#8211; you get:<br />
Brighter, Higher resolution, better blacks, a lamp that they say will last 5000 hours at full power, and a shiny new 2 year warranty on everything, plus if there is a problem, Epson ships you a replacement &#8211; the next day&#8230;    On the other hand, you fix your Panny, and only what was fixed gets a new warranty, and probably for 90 days maybe a year&#8230;    Other than finding the $400, I can&#8217;t think of a good reason not to.  I can&#8217;t think of anything that a PT-AE700 will do as well as an 8350.   &#8211; ok?  -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-123385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-123385</guid>
		<description>Art,
I came across this site while looking for a review of the Epson 8350, and I have to say yours is probably the most comprehensive and thorough of any I&#039;ve found - thanks!
I&#039;ve owned a Panasonic AE700U for 6 years, and have overall been pleased with the picture, but now the unit will need $900 in repairs due to using an aftermarket lamp (original went at about 1300 hours)that (supposedly) has damaged the power supply and ballast.  My question is, is a new unit like the Epson 8350 worth the extra $400 it will cost over getting the 700U repaired?  I have a dedicated home theater with no ambient light and a 106&quot; Da-lite Cinema Contour screen, and watch mostly sports and movies in the theater room.

Thanks for your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art,<br />
I came across this site while looking for a review of the Epson 8350, and I have to say yours is probably the most comprehensive and thorough of any I&#8217;ve found &#8211; thanks!<br />
I&#8217;ve owned a Panasonic AE700U for 6 years, and have overall been pleased with the picture, but now the unit will need $900 in repairs due to using an aftermarket lamp (original went at about 1300 hours)that (supposedly) has damaged the power supply and ballast.  My question is, is a new unit like the Epson 8350 worth the extra $400 it will cost over getting the 700U repaired?  I have a dedicated home theater with no ambient light and a 106&#8243; Da-lite Cinema Contour screen, and watch mostly sports and movies in the theater room.</p>
<p>Thanks for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-121564</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 19:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-121564</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe,

Well, in part, that&#039;s why we do an annual report.   That said, the 8700ub is only a minor update over the 8500ub.  Check out the current comparison report, there&#039;s enough comparing this projector to that one, etc. to answer your questions.

But the bottom line...   The Epson can match the black levels or beat them of anything I&#039;ve seen from Runco.  On the other hand, every Runco I&#039;ve looked at, produces more natural looking color and skin tones than any Epson post calibration...   The Epson does a great job, but that&#039;s Runco&#039;s thing...   gorgeous looking skin tones, great color overall.  Every runco we&#039;ve even looked at, looked great out of the box, even if brightness and contrast settings could use a little tweaking.   Bigger differences though are brightness, support, etc.  -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe,</p>
<p>Well, in part, that&#8217;s why we do an annual report.   That said, the 8700ub is only a minor update over the 8500ub.  Check out the current comparison report, there&#8217;s enough comparing this projector to that one, etc. to answer your questions.</p>
<p>But the bottom line&#8230;   The Epson can match the black levels or beat them of anything I&#8217;ve seen from Runco.  On the other hand, every Runco I&#8217;ve looked at, produces more natural looking color and skin tones than any Epson post calibration&#8230;   The Epson does a great job, but that&#8217;s Runco&#8217;s thing&#8230;   gorgeous looking skin tones, great color overall.  Every runco we&#8217;ve even looked at, looked great out of the box, even if brightness and contrast settings could use a little tweaking.   Bigger differences though are brightness, support, etc.  -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mini projector review</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-121348</link>
		<dc:creator>mini projector review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-121348</guid>
		<description>Hello Art Feierman, that´s great! I just read your first look review. Can´t wait to see the full one. Definetely will keep my eye on.
Cheers !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Art Feierman, that´s great! I just read your first look review. Can´t wait to see the full one. Definetely will keep my eye on.<br />
Cheers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/04/06/update-home-theater-projector-reviews-and-the-home-theater-report/comment-page-1/#comment-120716</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1109#comment-120716</guid>
		<description>I am just wondering how a $2000 projector like the Epson 8700UB compares to more expensive models from Runco and other manufacturers. I went into a demonstration room trying to see differences from the 8700, and I could not distinguish its picture quality in a light controlled room from others. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just wondering how a $2000 projector like the Epson 8700UB compares to more expensive models from Runco and other manufacturers. I went into a demonstration room trying to see differences from the 8700, and I could not distinguish its picture quality in a light controlled room from others. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
