<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Runco LightStyle LS-5 Home Theater Projector &#8211; on Deck for a Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/05/24/runco-lightstyle-ls-5-home-theater-projector-on-deck-for-a-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/05/24/runco-lightstyle-ls-5-home-theater-projector-on-deck-for-a-review/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on home theater projectors being reviewed, related products, and tips for users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/05/24/runco-lightstyle-ls-5-home-theater-projector-on-deck-for-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-121563</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1158#comment-121563</guid>
		<description>Hey Drexler,

Perfect timing. after watching it a bit, I figured out the same thing...  I&#039;ve already emailed Runco for clarification.  It sure &quot;looks and cooks&quot; like that old Planar.  What I do about the review will depend on how well they convince me that the LS-5 has been improved in the 2.5+ years since I reviewed the 8150.  No doubt a lot of firmware improvements, but anything worth me investing another 20-25 hours, I&#039;m definitely not sure at this point.  - keep you all posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Drexler,</p>
<p>Perfect timing. after watching it a bit, I figured out the same thing&#8230;  I&#8217;ve already emailed Runco for clarification.  It sure &#8220;looks and cooks&#8221; like that old Planar.  What I do about the review will depend on how well they convince me that the LS-5 has been improved in the 2.5+ years since I reviewed the 8150.  No doubt a lot of firmware improvements, but anything worth me investing another 20-25 hours, I&#8217;m definitely not sure at this point.  &#8211; keep you all posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drexler</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2011/05/24/runco-lightstyle-ls-5-home-theater-projector-on-deck-for-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-121448</link>
		<dc:creator>Drexler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 07:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1158#comment-121448</guid>
		<description>Just curious, but isn&#039;t the LS-5 just a Planar PD8150 with a Runco sticker on it? You have already done that review if I remember correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, but isn&#8217;t the LS-5 just a Planar PD8150 with a Runco sticker on it? You have already done that review if I remember correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
