<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BenQ W7000 Review &#8211; Update 1-26-2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on home theater projectors being reviewed, related products, and tips for users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-325718</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-325718</guid>
		<description>Greetings Fabio

The W7000 should easily do better than your marantz in terms of black levels.  The 4001 is a 5 year old DLP projector with a dynamic iris. (I never reviewed any version). However back then, none of the DLPs with irises were any match for today&#039;s ultra-high contrast projectors.  The Marantz spec, of 6500:1 is likely conservative, but still, I would think you&#039;ll not only get a dramatic improvement in black levels, but you are also going from a 720p projector to a 1080p one.  
Good luck, you should love the change, and more brightness as well - art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings Fabio</p>
<p>The W7000 should easily do better than your marantz in terms of black levels.  The 4001 is a 5 year old DLP projector with a dynamic iris. (I never reviewed any version). However back then, none of the DLPs with irises were any match for today&#8217;s ultra-high contrast projectors.  The Marantz spec, of 6500:1 is likely conservative, but still, I would think you&#8217;ll not only get a dramatic improvement in black levels, but you are also going from a 720p projector to a 1080p one.<br />
Good luck, you should love the change, and more brightness as well &#8211; art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-321297</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-321297</guid>
		<description>I own a Marantz vp-4001 (aka sharp z3000 I think), and I can&#039;t find a single person that is able to tell me if a projector like this W7000 would have better contrast and black levels than mine. Ratings as we know don&#039;t mean much...
Art, you are my last hope :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a Marantz vp-4001 (aka sharp z3000 I think), and I can&#8217;t find a single person that is able to tell me if a projector like this W7000 would have better contrast and black levels than mine. Ratings as we know don&#8217;t mean much&#8230;<br />
Art, you are my last hope <img src='http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-259162</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-259162</guid>
		<description>Hi CarmineM

A short review (I&#039;m watching the 6010 right now), will likely be posted tonight - tomorrow latest.  I&#039;ve finished it, and sent it to Lisa, to do some reformatting. -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CarmineM</p>
<p>A short review (I&#8217;m watching the 6010 right now), will likely be posted tonight &#8211; tomorrow latest.  I&#8217;ve finished it, and sent it to Lisa, to do some reformatting. -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarmineM</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-259153</link>
		<dc:creator>CarmineM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-259153</guid>
		<description>Hi Art,

I am seriously considering the Epson 6010, but I can&#039;t find any recent reviews based on a postproduction model.

Have you had a chance to review the postproduction model yet, and if not, do you know of any rigorous reviews that have been done.

I am not looking for a cut and paste type from the Epson web page.

Lastly is the advertized 480 refresh rate a true physical 480 hz refresh rate or is the refresh rate emulated, like 240 hz performing like 960 as some LED TV’s are now advertizing?  I am seeing reference to both actual refresh rate and artificially enhanced in various sources and am confused.

Thanks, Carmine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Art,</p>
<p>I am seriously considering the Epson 6010, but I can&#8217;t find any recent reviews based on a postproduction model.</p>
<p>Have you had a chance to review the postproduction model yet, and if not, do you know of any rigorous reviews that have been done.</p>
<p>I am not looking for a cut and paste type from the Epson web page.</p>
<p>Lastly is the advertized 480 refresh rate a true physical 480 hz refresh rate or is the refresh rate emulated, like 240 hz performing like 960 as some LED TV’s are now advertizing?  I am seeing reference to both actual refresh rate and artificially enhanced in various sources and am confused.</p>
<p>Thanks, Carmine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-259142</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-259142</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve, yes they are.  The W7000 should be arriving today.  I was prepared to drive the 20+ miles to get it, but they emailed this morning, that it shipped yesterday, so should arrive here in a couple of hours!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve, yes they are.  The W7000 should be arriving today.  I was prepared to drive the 20+ miles to get it, but they emailed this morning, that it shipped yesterday, so should arrive here in a couple of hours!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/01/26/benq-w7000-review-update-1-26-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-257079</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-257079</guid>
		<description>So Art... are the folks in Asia back to work yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Art&#8230; are the folks in Asia back to work yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
