<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic PT-AR100U Home Theater Projector: A &#8220;First Look&#8221; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on home theater projectors being reviewed, related products, and tips for users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-364915</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-364915</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew.  A couple things.  Today&#039;s BD surface has been improved (and is much better on horizontal per SI) - which is why I&#039;m going to get an SI 1.4 for my living room if the wife will allow me (motorized).   If you haven&#039;t pulled the trigger... I&#039;d probably say grab an 8350.  pocket the other $350, and put that towards your next projector...   -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew.  A couple things.  Today&#8217;s BD surface has been improved (and is much better on horizontal per SI) &#8211; which is why I&#8217;m going to get an SI 1.4 for my living room if the wife will allow me (motorized).   If you haven&#8217;t pulled the trigger&#8230; I&#8217;d probably say grab an 8350.  pocket the other $350, and put that towards your next projector&#8230;   -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-353957</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 00:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-353957</guid>
		<description>OK. I&#039;ve re-evaluated everything, I should be able to get the SI screen out of the gate. Which gain would be best w/ an 8350? I say 8350 because local Best Buy has display model on sale for $899 and lowest I found AR100U was $1250 online. My room is currently moderately filled w/ ambient side sunlight. I am able to close the shades on the two remaining windows but I would rather be able to have natural light than fluorecant overhead. In you SI review of the 1.4 you mentioned shortcomings on natural side light. Should the 0.8 gain screen be better? Or is there another screen I should look at all together?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I&#8217;ve re-evaluated everything, I should be able to get the SI screen out of the gate. Which gain would be best w/ an 8350? I say 8350 because local Best Buy has display model on sale for $899 and lowest I found AR100U was $1250 online. My room is currently moderately filled w/ ambient side sunlight. I am able to close the shades on the two remaining windows but I would rather be able to have natural light than fluorecant overhead. In you SI review of the 1.4 you mentioned shortcomings on natural side light. Should the 0.8 gain screen be better? Or is there another screen I should look at all together?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-353536</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-353536</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew,

If you really believe you won&#039;t become more of a projector enthusiast/purist (hard for us audiophiles), then your life is simpler.  

For 2D only, the Epson&#039;s key strength would be warranty and support.  The 8350 is getting a bit &quot;long in the tooth&quot;.
Between the W6000 and PT-AR100U projectors though, first thing to ask yourself:  Are you rainbow sensitive?  If you don&#039;t know, you might want to play it safe and stick with an LCD projector instead of the DLP powered W6000.

The W6000 is the more purist of the two.  While not as bright, it&#039;s still one of the brighter out there.  It definitely delivers better blacks, but that really won&#039;t matter at all until you have that Black Diamond...  More to the point, the W6000 has that DLP look and feel.  It&#039;s not a critical thing, but many of us just sort of like the way DLP&#039;s look, to me, it&#039;s mostly on darker scenes - in terms of color saturation, but whatever, there are many loyalists.

So, that said, I&#039;m one of them... but, I also love black levels, which the W6000 is very good at.  On the other hand it&#039;s been almost 5 years and 3 newer projectors since I last bought a DLP, because I&#039;m rainbow sensitive.  The W6000&#039;s very good, in that regard, but not as good as the far more expensive Sharp XV-Z30000 I just reviewed.

My final best guess...   start with the PT-AR100U, but after you get that good screen, my bet is within a year or two, you&#039;ll be wishing for something higher end, be it 2D or 3D (I love great 3D content), it&#039;s the audiophile in you.  At that point, I&#039;ll bet you will be shopping for great black levels, and other performance improvements...   Best of luck.  And, how about returning here with some good personal feedback about your decision, and how it is working out.  Best if you do that at least 2 weeks after you are up and running.  Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>If you really believe you won&#8217;t become more of a projector enthusiast/purist (hard for us audiophiles), then your life is simpler.  </p>
<p>For 2D only, the Epson&#8217;s key strength would be warranty and support.  The 8350 is getting a bit &#8220;long in the tooth&#8221;.<br />
Between the W6000 and PT-AR100U projectors though, first thing to ask yourself:  Are you rainbow sensitive?  If you don&#8217;t know, you might want to play it safe and stick with an LCD projector instead of the DLP powered W6000.</p>
<p>The W6000 is the more purist of the two.  While not as bright, it&#8217;s still one of the brighter out there.  It definitely delivers better blacks, but that really won&#8217;t matter at all until you have that Black Diamond&#8230;  More to the point, the W6000 has that DLP look and feel.  It&#8217;s not a critical thing, but many of us just sort of like the way DLP&#8217;s look, to me, it&#8217;s mostly on darker scenes &#8211; in terms of color saturation, but whatever, there are many loyalists.</p>
<p>So, that said, I&#8217;m one of them&#8230; but, I also love black levels, which the W6000 is very good at.  On the other hand it&#8217;s been almost 5 years and 3 newer projectors since I last bought a DLP, because I&#8217;m rainbow sensitive.  The W6000&#8242;s very good, in that regard, but not as good as the far more expensive Sharp XV-Z30000 I just reviewed.</p>
<p>My final best guess&#8230;   start with the PT-AR100U, but after you get that good screen, my bet is within a year or two, you&#8217;ll be wishing for something higher end, be it 2D or 3D (I love great 3D content), it&#8217;s the audiophile in you.  At that point, I&#8217;ll bet you will be shopping for great black levels, and other performance improvements&#8230;   Best of luck.  And, how about returning here with some good personal feedback about your decision, and how it is working out.  Best if you do that at least 2 weeks after you are up and running.  Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-351324</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 23:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-351324</guid>
		<description>Art, I&#039;m looking to get my first projector and this is on my short list along w/ Benq W6000 and Epson 8350. I&#039;ve seen the 8350 in action probably a year ago and thought it was awesome. I&#039;m more of an audiophile than videophile and am in no way a projector purist. It is for a family room that will not be bright but dim most times and light will mostly be natural, indirect light. It will be my used as my main TV and I watch sports a lot, movies from time to time. I will start out projecting onto a wall at first, probably a 100-106&quot; image. I was eying a SI Black Diamond screen later on one I was able to save up. My room in very large (40x20&#039; loft) w/ large windows on the one side, half of which I block out for lighting purposes. I don&#039;t care about 3D. My viewing distance will be about 12-15&#039;. The cost of each seems to be a relative wash, w/ the Benq being about $10-150 more. I know the Panny got 2012 best in class w/ Benq as a 2D runner-up, but I didn&#039;t see many direct coparisons. Which could you recommend for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art, I&#8217;m looking to get my first projector and this is on my short list along w/ Benq W6000 and Epson 8350. I&#8217;ve seen the 8350 in action probably a year ago and thought it was awesome. I&#8217;m more of an audiophile than videophile and am in no way a projector purist. It is for a family room that will not be bright but dim most times and light will mostly be natural, indirect light. It will be my used as my main TV and I watch sports a lot, movies from time to time. I will start out projecting onto a wall at first, probably a 100-106&#8243; image. I was eying a SI Black Diamond screen later on one I was able to save up. My room in very large (40&#215;20&#8242; loft) w/ large windows on the one side, half of which I block out for lighting purposes. I don&#8217;t care about 3D. My viewing distance will be about 12-15&#8242;. The cost of each seems to be a relative wash, w/ the Benq being about $10-150 more. I know the Panny got 2012 best in class w/ Benq as a 2D runner-up, but I didn&#8217;t see many direct coparisons. Which could you recommend for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-291440</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-291440</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,  Sorry for the delay, overlooked your question.   No problem with a gray screen.  If anything that will lower your black levels, always a good thing on lower priced projectors.  You have lumens to spare for most situations, so a slightly less bright image - but one that also helps by rejecting some side ambient light.  If it makes sense in your room, definitely go for it.  No real downside except it&#039;s a touch less bright... -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,  Sorry for the delay, overlooked your question.   No problem with a gray screen.  If anything that will lower your black levels, always a good thing on lower priced projectors.  You have lumens to spare for most situations, so a slightly less bright image &#8211; but one that also helps by rejecting some side ambient light.  If it makes sense in your room, definitely go for it.  No real downside except it&#8217;s a touch less bright&#8230; -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-283307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-283307</guid>
		<description>Art,

How would this projector work with a grey screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art,</p>
<p>How would this projector work with a grey screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-275731</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 07:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-275731</guid>
		<description>Ahh, I&#039;m no movie reviewer Ed, but...    I can&#039;t really argue with the Blu-ray.com review, regarding crosstalk, but some folks are more bothered by crosstalk than others.  
I&#039;ve now watched  the 3D version in my theater 3 full times (I love the movie, the &quot;steampunk&quot;, Scorsese&#039;s incredible directing, and the treatment of 3D as something for grownups, not just kids.)   I notice the crosstalk when looking for it, but for me (I&#039;m not that sensitive, so I normally stay out of the debate.  (I see the rainbow effect, on the other hand, while many others barely do, or don&#039;t at all.)  It&#039;s so early on, I&#039;m not even sure that I&#039;m much less sensitive to crosstalk than the average person.  

IN the case of Hugo, I don&#039;t care.  To me, the movie is stunning in 3D.  Let me put it another way, with many 3D projectors, there&#039;s a brightness control on the projector - generally referred to for the 3D glasses.  usually 3 or 4 modes from bright to &quot;low&quot; (was going to say dim).  No matter what the content, the brightest setting usually has plenty of crosstalk (in this case a projector issue, not a blu-ray transfer issue).  I don&#039;t watch above &quot;medium&quot;, sacrificing some needed brightness. I would say that running any of those projectors in the brightest glasses mode offers a good deal more crosstalk than that Hugo disc.

To answer your last question.  It can be the media or the projector, or both.  Occasionally on the forums I&#039;ll read one guy saying &quot;that projector&#039;s got a lot of crosstalk&quot; and the next guy says, no way, it&#039;s the movie you are watching... and vice versa...   I don&#039;t care about whatever level the disc has, I&#039;ll rank Hugo now as the favorite 3D content I own, that&#039;s a movie, and probably overall, despite Ultimate Wave Tahiti 3D, Hubble 3D, and a bunch of non-movie 3D I now own (maybe 60 hours of non movies, plus more than a dozen movies.  

In other words, effects or not, this a great movie, and I barely can see how folks fully immersed in the movie, even notice the crosstalk.  

With the great variation in comments relating to the Hugo review, perhaps, in some cases, the issue is a combination of the movie transfer, and whatever crosstalk the display has?  Well, get some popcorn, the disc, and enjoy. -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I&#8217;m no movie reviewer Ed, but&#8230;    I can&#8217;t really argue with the Blu-ray.com review, regarding crosstalk, but some folks are more bothered by crosstalk than others.<br />
I&#8217;ve now watched  the 3D version in my theater 3 full times (I love the movie, the &#8220;steampunk&#8221;, Scorsese&#8217;s incredible directing, and the treatment of 3D as something for grownups, not just kids.)   I notice the crosstalk when looking for it, but for me (I&#8217;m not that sensitive, so I normally stay out of the debate.  (I see the rainbow effect, on the other hand, while many others barely do, or don&#8217;t at all.)  It&#8217;s so early on, I&#8217;m not even sure that I&#8217;m much less sensitive to crosstalk than the average person.  </p>
<p>IN the case of Hugo, I don&#8217;t care.  To me, the movie is stunning in 3D.  Let me put it another way, with many 3D projectors, there&#8217;s a brightness control on the projector &#8211; generally referred to for the 3D glasses.  usually 3 or 4 modes from bright to &#8220;low&#8221; (was going to say dim).  No matter what the content, the brightest setting usually has plenty of crosstalk (in this case a projector issue, not a blu-ray transfer issue).  I don&#8217;t watch above &#8220;medium&#8221;, sacrificing some needed brightness. I would say that running any of those projectors in the brightest glasses mode offers a good deal more crosstalk than that Hugo disc.</p>
<p>To answer your last question.  It can be the media or the projector, or both.  Occasionally on the forums I&#8217;ll read one guy saying &#8220;that projector&#8217;s got a lot of crosstalk&#8221; and the next guy says, no way, it&#8217;s the movie you are watching&#8230; and vice versa&#8230;   I don&#8217;t care about whatever level the disc has, I&#8217;ll rank Hugo now as the favorite 3D content I own, that&#8217;s a movie, and probably overall, despite Ultimate Wave Tahiti 3D, Hubble 3D, and a bunch of non-movie 3D I now own (maybe 60 hours of non movies, plus more than a dozen movies.  </p>
<p>In other words, effects or not, this a great movie, and I barely can see how folks fully immersed in the movie, even notice the crosstalk.  </p>
<p>With the great variation in comments relating to the Hugo review, perhaps, in some cases, the issue is a combination of the movie transfer, and whatever crosstalk the display has?  Well, get some popcorn, the disc, and enjoy. -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-275716</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-275716</guid>
		<description>Hi Fair Lady!
I can&#039;t be sure. Swamp coolers?  Maybe...  first time anyone asked.  Not sure about humidity specs, but the manufacturer data sheets might say.

the 10 hours a day, really shouldn&#039;t be a problem for any

I tend to favor LCD projectors for most biz/education uses, but they do have one disadvantage:  dust can get into their &quot;lightpath&quot;  Thus what are called &quot;dust blobs&quot; (very scientific), can show up.  That&#039;s a factory cleaning type of thing.  DLP&#039;s have &quot;sealed light paths&quot; not as perfect as they would have you believe, but still far more dust and dirt resistant.

With that said, best if that DLP projector has a dust filter, (few do, because of that sealed light path).

I normally don&#039;t track that, and don&#039;t have time to research filter/no filter, but I have emailed my product manager contacts at 4 companies.  Hope to have the replies in the next few days.  -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fair Lady!<br />
I can&#8217;t be sure. Swamp coolers?  Maybe&#8230;  first time anyone asked.  Not sure about humidity specs, but the manufacturer data sheets might say.</p>
<p>the 10 hours a day, really shouldn&#8217;t be a problem for any</p>
<p>I tend to favor LCD projectors for most biz/education uses, but they do have one disadvantage:  dust can get into their &#8220;lightpath&#8221;  Thus what are called &#8220;dust blobs&#8221; (very scientific), can show up.  That&#8217;s a factory cleaning type of thing.  DLP&#8217;s have &#8220;sealed light paths&#8221; not as perfect as they would have you believe, but still far more dust and dirt resistant.</p>
<p>With that said, best if that DLP projector has a dust filter, (few do, because of that sealed light path).</p>
<p>I normally don&#8217;t track that, and don&#8217;t have time to research filter/no filter, but I have emailed my product manager contacts at 4 companies.  Hope to have the replies in the next few days.  -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-275004</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 06:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-275004</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan, I don&#039;t believe they are the same, though I never checked.  The AR100 is 2D only, no CFI, etc.  while faster panels are better, my guess is using lower cost panels makes sense, or the Panny likely would be more expensive. -art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan, I don&#8217;t believe they are the same, though I never checked.  The AR100 is 2D only, no CFI, etc.  while faster panels are better, my guess is using lower cost panels makes sense, or the Panny likely would be more expensive. -art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Feierman</title>
		<link>http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/2012/03/06/panasonic-pt-ar100u-home-theater-projector-a-first-look-review/comment-page-1/#comment-275002</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Feierman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 05:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectorreviews.com/blog/?p=1639#comment-275002</guid>
		<description>Hi Ken, not sure which projector you are referring to.  If the pt-ar100u, black levels are reasonably good for the 999 price, but no match for the Epson 5010 or BenQ W7000, although comparable to the Epson 8350 or 3010.  Please clarify, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken, not sure which projector you are referring to.  If the pt-ar100u, black levels are reasonably good for the 999 price, but no match for the Epson 5010 or BenQ W7000, although comparable to the Epson 8350 or 3010.  Please clarify, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
