Classroom Projector Report: Awards For Best School Projector
Our Best In Classroom awards (and other awards) for the upcoming 2011-2012 school year. Most of the projectors we've reviewed for this report, have just started shipping recently, in time to be considered this spring/summer for purchase (and installation?) in time for the 2011 - 2012 school year. Several were introduced last year, but not in time for the report, while a couple are now more than a year old.
On this page we list the Winners of our Best In Classroom awards with comments, for the most impressive projectors we've reviewed for education. In addition a number of projectors have received (in addition, or alone) our more general, Hot Product and Special Interest awards, as many of these projectors are also excellent for general business usage.
5/9/2011 - Art Feierman
|
|
School Projectors for K12 - The Award Winners:
We finished off this year's education projector report with 16 separate projectors reviewed...
As was the case last year, emails and conversations have been going back and forth between myself, and Tony, and Mike (the other reviewers), as we sorted out which were the most deserving.
One change for this year. Last year, only one serious interactive projector was shipping in time for the report. That was the Epson Brightlink 450wi which we didn't bother to give a Best In Classroom award, as Tony (who reviewed it) and I were so impressed, it instead received our highest possible award: Outstanding Product of the Year.
This year with a large number of interactive projectors (four, up from one, last year), we've split the awards into three groups:
Best In Classroom - Projectors
Best In Classroom -
Interactive Projectors
Best In Classroom - Value Proposition
| Projectors (standard) | Interactive Projectors |
| Acer X1261P | BenQ MP780ST |
| Casio XJ-A250V | Epson Brightlink 455Wi |
| Epson Powerlite 1775W | InFocus IN3916 |
| Epson Powerlite 96W | Optoma TW675UTi-3D |
| Hitachi CP-X5021N | |
| Hitachi CP-AW250N | |
| NEC NP216 | |
| Optoma TW610ST | |
| Samsung F10M | |
| Sanyo PLC-WM5500 | |
| Sharp PG-D45X3D | |
| Sony VPL-EX175 |
The Best In Classroom: Value Proposition is chosen from all of the reviewed projectors.
Best In Classroom: Interactive Projector Awards:
This year we have four interactive projectors out of the sixteen reviewed. Two have been selected for our Best In Classroom award for Interactive Projectors. This year, it's a tie. Consensus here was that the Epson was the more advanced and capable of the two - the other being the BenQ MP780ST, but the BenQ had two features that potentially level the field. The first is the key one. The only shortcoming we can think of with the Epson is that it is not 3D capable. Interactivity has been around a long time, and it may still be a few years before 3D has anything resembling widespread use. That said, 3D compatibility is a factor that might be important to some schools down the road.
Ultimately I let Tony and Mike argue it out. Tony who reviewed the Epson again, this year, thinks it's great, but see's the 3D issue as the one area it can't match the BenQ. Mike likes the BenQ for the 3D compatibility and slightly lower price...
When push came to shove, although there are lots of minor differences, it comes down to the Epson's better (greater) range of interactive features, vs. The potential advantage of being 3D capable. I solved the problem: Tie, no runner-up!
Best in Classroom - Interactive Projector Award: BenQ MP780ST
The BenQ MP780ST is one impressive Interactive Projector. Unlike the Epson that it shares our top Classroom award with, the BenQ is 3D ready. That's a key reason why 
I'm writing about it now. Epson set a pretty high bar with the launch last year of their Brightlink 450wi, and while the BenQ can't do everything the Epson interactive can, 3D is one of several things that the BenQ brings to the contest that the Epson can't match.
This BenQ MP780ST is a Very Short Throw projector. Some might call it an ultra-short throw projector. At only 3.3 feet distance for a 95" diagonal image it will be further than a true ultra-short projector like the Epson, but a couple of feet closer than many of the short throw projectors out there. The combination of the close mounting, and that the interactive wand doesn't need to be near the screen to use it, is a great combination cure to the issue of teachers being in the projector's light, and casting a shadow as well.
The BenQ has a full set of network features including presentation abilities, and supports Crestron's RoomView. In addition the MP780ST can do PC free presentations from its USB input and on board media player! Need HDMI, no problem (the Epson lacks HDMI). Overall the BenQ has a healthy set of inputs (but lacks the microphone input/amp that the Epson has).
The BenQ seems to sell for about $200 less than the Epson as of this writing, but those things tend to be very fluid, and especially so if you are looking for small or large quantities of projectors.
A Few of the BenQ MP780ST projector strengths:
- A Very Short throw projector can project a 95" (large) image from one meter distance (3.3 feet). This helps keep the teacher from casting a shadow on the screen
- Interactive wand does not require being next to the screen or surface, can be used from across the room (with more imprecision of course)
- Typically used with telescoping wall mount, right above the screen or surface
- Very nicely bright
- Excellent sound (2 10 watt speakers)
- Very good color, for a DLP projector in the bright modes, very good overall
- Nice sharp image
- 3D ready - just add active glasses and some content
Above, MP780ST projector's on screen tool bar
Bottom Line on the BenQ MP780ST interactive projector: A fine, bright, very short throw projector by any measure, but becomes far better for the suite of software and interactive features. It is 3D, however, that sets the MP780ST apart from the Epson. The BenQ - a widescreen DLP projector if not previously mentioned - does get the nod from our reviewers for the best interactive features among the three, 3D capable interactive projectors (all DLP).
Best in Classroom Interactive Projector Award: Epson Brightlink 455wi
Last year we gave the the predecessor of this Epson Brightlink 455wi our Outstanding Product of the Year award. It represented a major step forward 
in interactive projectors, and one that likely would help usher in a new age where interactive projectors become integral tools to facilitate better learning. OK, that's a bit of hype, but interactivity done well, is a very good thing. we had invited several companies to send us their just announced interactive projectors (last year) but only Epson's was available in time for the report.
This year's Epson Brightlink 455wi improves on last year's projector in several minor ways, and one interesting new twist. The new twist is a table projection option. mount the projector essentially to/above a table, and the Epson can project onto the table, for a truly interactive experience with the students sitting or standing around the table. Most impressive. Tony discusses and shows an image, in his full review of the Brightlink 455wi.
While truly feature laden, the 3LCD Epson Brightlink 455wi doesn't have everything. Like last year's it still lacks an HDMI input. Lamp life is on the short side of average among the projectors in this report with 2500/3500 hours. This is a WXGA projector. Widescreens are definitely better than older XGA resolution for interactive work. Even eliminating layout reasons, widescreen projected images aren't as tall, teachers and students can reach and work on the upper portions of the screen or wall surface.
A Few of the Epson Brightlink 455wi projector strengths:
- Great color
- Bright
- Extensive networking (control and notification)
- Microphone Input
- Most interactive feature set of those reviewed
- Good sound from 10 watt speaker system
- Excellent Input and output flexibility: Computer (analog), and also USB Display Link for presenting from PC via USB, plus networking, video, mic input, variable audio out, and more
- Average cost of operation
- Best warranty (tie): For education (Brilliant Futures program) three years P/L with 3 year replacement program
- Good sound from 10 watt speaker system
- Ultra-short throw for easy, low cost mounting almost directly above the screen
- Ultra-short throw keeps projector light out of the teacher (or presenting student's) eyes, when working at the board
Epson interactive tool bars (above)
Bottom Line on the Epson Brightlink 455wi interactive projector: What's not to like? Great overall picture, Ultra-short throw benefits. Easy to use interactive wand, highly respected 3rd party software, WXGA, Bright, Plenty of networking features, including push notifications, and a great warranty. It was primarily the lack of 3D capability that could prove to be a long term limitation. On the other hand, 3D still isn't ready for mass implementation.
Best In Classroom Award
Best in Classroom Award (Non-Interactive Projector): Epson Powerlite 96W
The Epson Powerlite 96W, looks and cooks very much like last year's Powerlite 85+ which also took this award. This year, though, the addition of HDMI, widescreen layout (instead of XGA), and some other enhancements.
Last year we raved about the color, and that remains true. Mike listed that as a key strength of the Epson 96W, the 
best color of any of the projectors he reviewed for the report, and he reviewed half of the sixteen.
Last year our biggest complaint with the older Epson, was the lack of an HDMI (or DVI) for digital input. The Epson 96W has HDMI added, so scratch that from a very short list of items. This year, the only real shortcoming that comes to mind is lack of 3D capability. Despite that, from all the feedback from Mike, Tony (and myself), no one could come up with another projector that could challenge this Epson 96W overall.
Placement flexibility is typical for portable / fixed install projectors, with a 1.2:1 zoom. That's a far cry from the Casio's 2:1, but that's more of a portable projector, less likely to be mounted. Besides the Casio, though, none of the other projectors in the review offered significantly more range than the Epson.
Note that since the Powerlite 96W, a 3LCD projector, does have a filter to deal with. Even with the Epson's infrequent filter cleanings, it does mean a require more routine maintenance than the typical filter-free DLP projectors. This Epson however is tied for the longest lamp life for a projector with a conventional lamp (5000 hours at full, 6000 at eco-power) Only the Casio and Samsung can best that, as they don't use lamps (hybrid LED/Laser for the Casio, and LED light source for the Samsung).
A Few of the Epson Powerlite 96W projector strengths:
- Great color
- Bright
- Extensive networking (control and notification)
- Microphone Input
- Remote mousing features
- Excellent Input and output flexibility: Analog computer, plus HDMI, and also USB Display Link for presenting from PC via USB, plus networking, video, mic, audio out, and more
- Best warranty (tie): For education (Brilliant Futures program) three years P/L with 3 year replacement program
- Plenty of sound from the Epson 96W's 16 watt speaker
- Wireless networking (ok, it's an option, but, hey, if you need it...)
- Lamp rated 6000/5000 hours. (Eco/Full power), only bested by solid state light sources
Above, the Powerlite 96W projecting a much higher than native WXGA (1280x800) resolution, in this case, it is doing an impressive job (heavily cropped image) making small type readable even at 1680x1050 resolution.
Bottom Line on the Epson Powerlite 96W: This projector is a top performer, it's feature laden, has one of the lower cost of operations and a great warranty, plus lots of bells and whistles, including DisplayLink (USB computer interface), HDMI, Mic input, advanced networking and optional wireless. Price wise it's well priced, althought still has to be considered a mid-priced education projector that also has to compete with plenty of alternatives (including other Epson projectors) that are typically less projector for less money.
This Epson is the real thing, a first class full featured projector with advanced networking abilities, and as a bonus, even optional wireless networking if you like!
Best In Classroom, Runner-up: Projector Awards
Considering 16 projectors reviewed in this report
Best In Classroom Runner-up Winners (tie): Acer X1261P
While most of our winners are mid to higher priced projectors for the education market, it would be foolish not to recognize at least one, competent, really low cost projector in our awards mix. While all of our other winners of assorted Best In Classroom awards sell for well about $500, and a couple for more than $1000, this Acer X1261P comes in priced around $400, and that's without shopping for the lowest price around.
The ability to equip two or three classrooms with projectors without spending more than equipping just one room with one of the higher end interactive or even standard projectors has to be extremely tempting to tech coordinators, AV managers and IT folks.
The Acer is another machine best at portability, less ideal for mounting, but it still is capable at either. It is at least as capable as the Casios we discuss (and which share this award), for a fraction of the price. True, the Acer, is first and foremost, a micro-portable. As such it's stripped out a lot of features, to create an excellent value proposition at a rock bottom price. If you want to find something comparable, that's less, you are probably going to have to drop down to SVGA resolution, which finally seems to be fading away in terms of new school purchases.
For your roughly $400 you get an XGA projector (not SVGA which are common at this price point), you get 2 watt sound (and a quieter projector than the Casio), so while sound still is thin, it's a little better off than many other projectors of this size and sub-five pound weight. You don't get a control panel. Instead the small remote control can sit in a slot to become the control panel. Of course if mounted, you'll want it as a remote, and if portable, you can keep it with the projector. (There is a power switch on the X1261P projector.)
The Acer X1261P is very bright. It impressively beat its 2700 lumen claimed brightness. . That makes it brighter than average of the 16 projectors reviewed. Color was good for a DLP projector but not one of the very best. Again, consider the price.
If color was good in the brighter modes it was very impressive when I threw a movie or two at it (click for a larger versions) both images fed at 1080 resolution from Blu-ray disk - the first one with window open (ambient light) the second with the shutters closed:
In the image below, you may note the bright red isn't quite as bright (and pure) as it should be, but not bad. The yellow isn't great, but decent. The text performance - readability, is typical of XGA projectors in this report. We tested the Acer on resolutions up to 1440x900 and had no problem (and HD 1080 as well).
Below, the XP1261P in its native WXGA 1280x800 resolution
To manage good resolution (XGA), plenty of brightness, and other benefits and still be one of the most affordable projectors on the market, there are a couple of other compromises worth noting. First, this Acer lacks a zoom lens. If mounting, and using a screen, that will require some fairly precise alignment, but unless there's something preventing mounting at that spot, it is a minor point. BTW, the Acer projector offers 2X digital zoom.
One area important to consider are the inputs. The Acer X1261P has only one true high res input, and that's the analog computer input - a standard HD15 connector. You can alternately feed a high resolution component video signal through the HD15 instead, but if you want two high res sources hooked up at one time, there's probably a $30-$75 switch box in your future. In the school environment, though two hi res sources is probably not common. Most schools are replacing VCRs with DVD players where possible, but Blu-ray (hi res) is still going to be rare. For standard DVD, please remember, that the Acer also has an S-video input, which is just fine. In other words, something needed to consider, but for most, probably not an issue, or a deal breaker.
While the Acer is far from the typical education projector, the entire time I reviewed it, I kept coming back to the high level of performance for the rock bottom price. True, it may not have every feature desired, but, you can definitely buy two of these for the cost of one of those Epsons. And don't forget, the Acer is 3D ready (add glasses), the Epson is not. A 5000/6000 hour lamp (ties the Epson for longest conventional lamp), and no filters, make the Acer's operational costs lower than all but the two projectors that don't use conventional lamps. We would have liked to have seen a better warranty though, as Acer only provides 1 year on the X1261P projector.
Bottom Line: More a portable than an install projector for the classroom, The Acer X1261p deserves a Best In Classroom - Runner-up award, most of all, for i's great performance relative to price. And, while its feature set is missing a number of niceties like networking, HDMI and a zoom lens, this Acer is bright, has respectable color, and 3D ready, with DLP-Link and nVidia 3D support, - for a price typically under $400 a unit!
Best in Classroom, Runner-up Award: Casio XJ-A250V, XJ-A255V
Deja vu! all over again. Last year we gave a runner-up award to the earlier XJ-A140 projector. This year we are letting two versions of the same projector share the award.
We reviewed only the Casio XJ-A250V, however, we believe that the slightly more expensive XJ-A255V to be the better value, due to a host of additional features including networking abilities, and USB. I am particularly impressed with that extra value the A255V provides, and as such, the decision was made to let the XJ-A255V piggyback on the A250V review, and snag a share of the award.
As was the case last year, these Casio projectors are ultra-slim, eco-friendly, and extremely portable. One of the real bell ringers though has to be cost of operation. The 20,000 hour hybrid LED/Laser light source, essentially means that the light source should outlast the effective life of the projector. Even at 30 hours a week of classroom use, 35 weeks a year (about the length of a school year), we're talking almost 20 years... No filters to change either, and you can get a warm fuzzy knowing about the 3 year or 6000 hour warranty on the light source.
This year Casio seems to have improved on their brightness. While last year, the A140 came up way short on brightness (about 40% below claim, this year the XJ-A250V came in at 2510 lumens (3000 claimed), about average for the field, and plenty bright for almost any classroom.
Below, the rather bright Casio XJ-A250V projecting about a 60 inch diagonal image. In the foreground is my MacBook Pro, at full brightness, for comparison. The room has moderate lighting on, but to properly expose the projected image, the room looks dark.
And the Casio Green-Slim projectors are 3D ready (add active glasses). This is one area where the Casios bring something to the classroom, that the Epson 96W does not!
Add to that the best placement flexibility of any of the projectors in our report (unless you count owning multiple lenses for the Sanyo PLC-VM5500), and its ability to be either a portable or ceiling mounted. Pretty impressive.
Despite the 2:1 zoom lens, the image appeared reasonably sharp - here's a closeup of the screen, in native WXGA (1280x800) mode:
On the other hand, the Casio(s) only finished as Runner-up, indicating, it too, isn't perfect. The primary shortfall for mounted school use, is the rather weak 1 watt speaker. Also the 250V offers no networking, a key reason why I included the 255V in this award. The Casio's colors overall are bright, and the reds are pretty good, but, perhaps because of the hybrid light source, there is a detectable amount of green in most of the modes. As you look at images though, you will seee a stronger green than the projector actually has. This may be attributible to the light source. Over the years, we have noted that different technologies, for various reasons, cause some shifting in how my digital SLRs capture the color. Oh, a touch of green is there, but our image of Standard mode looks to have a much stronger green tint than the projector itself!
It should be noted as well, that the Casio is rather noisy at its brightest. Still the projector has ample brightness if you need to quiet it down a bit. The projectors offer multiple brightness modes.
Like our winner, the Epson Powerlite 96W, the Casio XJ-A250V and XJ-A255V are WXGA projectors. That's another plus. And like most projectors in this year's report - these Casio projectors are sporting HDMI. The Casio has no trouble locking onto and displaying a 1080i/p signal.
We considered the Samsung F10M as an alternative with its even longer rated LED light source (after 20,000 hours - if they make it that long - who really cares?). The Samsung, sporting better color, however, comes in with only about 40% of the brightness of the Casios making it the least bright of the field. While we prefer the Samsung's color, the placement flexibility and brightness favor the Casio.
Below, the Casio handling 1600x900 resolution, well higher than native 1280x800. Colors, while not quite as good as some others, are definitely respectable. You can click for a larger version.
While we consider the A250V to be a better portable, and less likely to be mounted, the A255V despite the relatively weak audio,
is a reasonable mounting candidate. The idea of no routine maintenance during the projector's life, provides a huge labor saving advantage. The USB and wireless networking bring the A255V into the world of network administrators, and district wide implementations.
While not the best overall mountable projector in terms of features, the operational cost factor really makes these Casio projectors stand out.
Consider this real world justification: In a world where there's often money (grant money?) to buy and install projectors, but bare budgets rarely have any money for operational or maintenance costs, these two Casio projectors should make a lot of sense to IT managers and Tech coordinators.
Best in Classroom, Runner-up Award: Optoma TW610ST
Rounding out our Best in Classroom, Runner-Up awards, is a first class entry from Optoma. The TW610ST is a Very Short Throw projector. It is a DLP based WXGA resolution model with most of the bells and whistles. In fact it is pretty similar in the bells and whistles category with our overall winner, the Epson 96W. Unlike the 96W, however, this projector can be easily mounted on a telescoping wall mount.
A pair of 5 watt speakers will provide enough sound to fill a classroom, (don't get your expectations too high), and having a mic input can be a real plus in some situations. The projector sports remote mousing - basic interactivity.
Color was very good according to Mike, with a wide variety of preset modes. The Bright mode (the brightest as well) had a slight green caste, which is not uncommon. Of the projectors Mike reviewed, this was one of his favorites. Of the two he liked better, one is the Epson 96W which took top honors in this category, and the other; the BenQ MP780ST, which has tied for Best of the interactive projectors.
Below, first is Presentation mode, and below it, the brighter, but not quite as "pretty" (too much green) Bright mode:
As mentioned, this Optoma is a Very Short Throw (VST) projector. It can fill an 80" diagonal screen from 3 feet back (measured from front of the projector). That is, only a slightly smaller image than that BenQ (another VST projector) can project from the same distance. The Optoma uses a large convex lens. There is no zoom - as is typical of the VST and Ultra short throw projectors (UST?)
Above the Optoma handles text from an input signal higher than its WXGA resolution.
All considered, the Optoma TW610ST is perhaps a modern "classic" classroom projector. I say that because, first of all, it's a very short throw projector. The lower cost and greater simplicity of installing one on a telescoping wall mount, compared to a standard throw projector, can be significant. That and other reasons make very and ultra short throw projectors very good choices for schools. That the VST better allows a teacher (or presenter) to stand by the screen without being "blinded" or casting a shadow, is a plus.
Optoma's warranty, while not the best, is right up there. 3 years parts and labor (1 year on the lamp), and a first year replacement program, is better than all but 3 of the 12 brands reviewed!
Last year the BenQ 772ST won this same award. This Optoma is very similar, similar price, but the TW610ST has the advantage of being widescreen, and also by being about 300-500 lumens brighter, depending on modes. Video is very good.
Bottom line on the Optoma TW610ST: This is a really fine, well priced short throw variety projector. It's laid out nicely for the education market. Overall, it is most similar to the BenQ interactive, but lacking the interactivity. The also reviewed Optoma TW675UTI-3D, one of their new interactive projectors is even more similar to the BenQ. In discussions Tony and Mike ended up favoring the BenQ interactive over the Optoma interactive (each reviewed one of them), but, that doesn't mean this TW610ST can't best some of BenQ's short throw non-interactive projectors.
In other words, we'll finish as we started. The TW610ST is pretty much what the typical modern classroom projector should look like: Good picture and brightness, 3D compatibility, a great warranty and a very reasonable cost of operation with 4000 hour lamp rating in eco, and 3000 hours at full. Definitely a projector for most educators short list.
Best in Classroom: Value Proposition
There are plenty of feature laden, moderately expensive and expensive projectors, for the classroom. This year, however, of all the projectors we reviewed for this report (yes, 16), only one not only offered a pretty healthy feature set, including 3D and networking, but cost far less than any other projectors really suitable for mounting, with those and other features.
Best Classroom Value Proposition: NEC NP216 DLP Projector
This is actually sort of cool. The projector that wins this first time award is the (click for review) NEC NP216. What's interesting, is that the NP216, an XGA, DLP projector, with a very low price point, made it all the way to the point where awards were being decided, without garnering any significant attention or interest from any of us here. Basically it went almost unnoticed! It wasn't until I was hunting for a best value type projector that it showed up on my radar. Good thing, too!
That is to say, we mostly overlooked the NEC NP216. Many projectors we reviewed, simply offered more. The ultra and very short throw projectors are more advantageous for mounting. Brightness, while more than enough for classroom use (measured over 2500 lumens), was more than adequate, but average for the group. The zoom lens offers minimal placement flexibility, and so it goes.
Networking, while not the most advanced, is perfectly respectable for most installations, with remote management and control. The projector can also send email notifications (change lamp, error messages) to a network administrator. Administrators or even teachers can control the NEC NP216 projector using a web browser. That covers much of what any network admin would like to see.
Then we started noticing something really important! All the projectors that were catching our eye - impressing us, such as the BenQ interactive, or the Epson Powerlite 96W, or the Optoma TW610ST, tend to cost at least half as much again, as this NEC.
The NEC seems to have a single unit street price of under $550, and I'm starting to see authorized dealers quoting under $500. Only the Acer X1261P (of the 16 reviewed projectors) costs less. The NEC offers better color, networking, more inputs, bigger sound (7 watt speaker - definitely adequate for classrooms), for that roughly $125 - $150 or so difference.
Above, the NEC in it's High Bright mode. Actually very good color for a DLP in any relatively bright mode!
Above, the NEC NP216 handling a UXGA resolution source (1600x1200). No problem locking on, and extremely readable for being 2 resolutions above native! Impressive readability for an XGA projector, let alone a very low cost one!
On the downside (not that it really is), the NEC has this cute "carbon meter" showing the reduced carbon footprint of running the projector in Eco-mode. While that's clever, and, I guess, better than a simple spec on a data sheet, I wish they'd have spent the R&D on performance, rather than a cutsey marketing oriented feature. Oh well, even product managers are entitled to some fun. Besides, by the time you own the projector and have looked at the meter, well, you already own it... I guess it's there to convince people to run in Eco mode to save energy. Usually, though, the lower fan noise and the basic knowledge that low power means lower cost of operation, is enough to convince most, to lower brightness when not needed. With 2500 lumen projectors in a classroom, few will need full power. Consider, we used to say (just a decade ago) that 2000 lumens was enough for a 25 foot screen - dark room).
One might say: "If that's all you can find to kvetch about...regardig the NP216, then it must be a pretty good value", are words I would agree with.
Warranty is two years, no replacement program is included, but NEC does offer a range of extended warranties and support programs, so a school or district may be able spend a bit more to get the warranty coverage they desire. Still a standard two year warranty is pretty good on a $500ish projector.
Bottom Line on the NEC NP216 DLP projector for the classroom: This is an excellent small portable that is designed to work equally well, installed. It may not have a lot of cool features such as a microphone input, and we wouldn't mind seeing it have HDMI. All considered, it's 3D ready, support for computer resolutions to UXGA (we tested up to 1600x1200), good video performance and a good warranty (not great), with decent color, networking and a rock bottom price.
Next year I do believe we'll have to look at more lower cost networking projectors - more competition to the NP216 (and its successors), but from this year's field, the NP216 stands out as a great low cost, yet very capable projector for the classroom!
The End (of the awards).
NEXT: Physical Tour