Epson Home Cinema 1080 UB vs. JVC DLA-RS1x
This is probably the most interesting (in my opinion) of the one-on-one comparisons. In part, because the Epson is only about half the price of the JVC. Despite the huge price difference, these two projectors can easily be considered competitors, based on performance! You can also draw conclusions about the Pro version of the Epson, and the older JVC DLA-RS1, from this comparison.
Remember, please, that I haven’t yet received an DLA-RS1x for review, but I have owned the JVC DLA-RS1, for close to a year, and I’ve got an Epson Home Cinema 1080 UB here, for an extended period of time, thanks to the kind folks at Epson. I’ve been sufficiently impressed, that I now have about 250 hours on the Epson, with 150+ of those hours put on its lamp, since I published the review.
Links to additional one-on-one comparisons:
The Basics: What is similar about these two home theater projectors - features?
When it comes to the physical attributes of these two projectors, they are extremely similar. Both have 2:1 zoom lenses (actually the Epson is 2.1:1, but that’s not enough difference to quibble over). Both have extensive vertical and horizontal lens shift as well, combining for easy placement. In fact the two are very close, overall, in where they can be placed. It’s very unlikely, that from a placement standpoint, that if one works in your room, that the other won’t.
Above: Epson Home Cinema 1080 UB (first) JVC DLA-RS1x (second), not to scale, the JVC is much larger – figure their lenses are about the same size…
Both have two HDMI inputs, and both support HDMI 1.3 with Deep Color (not all projectors with 1.3 HDMI actually support Deep Color, for example, the two Sony’s – the VPL-VW40, and VPL-VW60). Note, my older JVC RS1 is HDMI 1.2, and therefore lacks Deep Color support.
Both are three panel devices, with the Epson being 3LCD, and the JVC, being three LCoS panels (which they call D-iLA panels, just as Sony calls theirs SXRD).
Both have very good remotes. I like my JVC remote, but like the Epson even more. Both remotes have good range.
Since were talking hardware right now, I should mention the projector warranties. Both projectors come with a two years, parts and labor warranty, but Epson wins this one by virtue of offering a replacement warranty, for both years. (Side note: The more expensive, but almost identical Pro version of the Epson comes with three years with replacement.)
Time to consider the differences:
Last year, the JVC DLA-RS1 almost universally received rave reviews by reviewers (myself included), and owners. When it comes to sharpness, however, the JVC was just average when it came to image sharpness. I know, it was a major consideration for me, when I was deciding on my “next” projector, back in March of last year. I did decide it was sharp enough, and haven’t regretted the purchase decision at all. Mind you were are not talking large differences, but subtle ones. Most likely if you saw the JVC at one place, and then one of the sharpest 1080p projectors at another, an hour later, many people wouldn’t notice any difference.
So, my point is, while sharpness varies on 1080p projectors, it doesn’t vary much. The worst of the 1080p projectors, when fed 1080i or 1080p content will still be immediately sharper than the sharpest of the 720p projectors, and the difference will be far greater, than when comparing different 1080p projector models.
So, how does the JVC DLA-RS1x stack up against the Epson? First, remember, that I have not yet received an RS1x for review, so my assumptions here, and in some other areas, are based on the RS1 that it replaces. In this case, it’s the same lens, lens shift, etc., so the two should be essentially identical.
And that means the JVC is a little soft compared to some of the competition. That competition definitely includes the Epson Home (and Pro) Cinema 1080 UB. I find the Epson provides a slightly sharper image, yet it is definitely not the sharpest in class, several other projectors being better.
How great a difference? With casual viewing you are not likely to notice. When viewing hi-def movies (Blu-ray), the difference is very slight, because there’s a lot going on, due to the content starting out on film, with film grain. In most cases, if I walk back into my theater, and look at the screen, I’m just not going to be able to use sharpness as a way of telling whether I’m running the Epson or JVC.
HDTV hi-def material is a little different, as the best of it (production qualities, not content), is now being shot with digital camcorders, not film. That means no film grain, and a perfect one-for-one pixel mapping (if overscan is off, and you aren’t using keystone correction). With content like that, from Discovery-HD and other channels, the difference is definitely more apparent, but still just a small difference.
I’ll definitely give the Epson the advantage, but, from my own experience, the difference in sharpness, is going to be a very minor issue, and not likely to affect the final buying decision.
You May Also Like
Epson PowerLite W29 Projector Review
Canon REALiS WUX450ST Projector Review
Millennials and Projectors: Optoma ML750 LED Projector Review: Part 2
ViewSonic PJD7835HD Projector Review
JVC DLA-RS400U Home Theater Projector Review
NEC P502WL Laser Projector Review
Epson PowerLite 955WH Projector Review
Epson Pro Cinema 1985 W Projector Review