
Ultra-short-throw (UST) projectors have emerged as a popular option for home entertainment enthusiasts seeking a massive, high-quality image without the cumbersome installation of traditional projectors. Currently, several excellent models are available on the market, but how do you determine which one is best suited for your needs?
The Projector Reviews team evaluates several ultra-short-throw projectors every year. While specifications like brightness and contrast ratios can provide some insight, they rarely reflect real-world usage. Memory and measurements alone don’t capture nuanced differences between projectors.
This is why, for the second year in a row, Projector Reviews has collaborated with ProjectorScreen.com to host the 2025 Ultra-Short Throw Projector Showdown. This event offers a unique opportunity for a group of experts and video enthusiasts to evaluate several popular UST projectors side-by-side in a controlled environment. The goal of the event is to provide potential projector customers with the information they need to make informed purchasing decisions.
In this article, we will provide an overview of the event and share some insights I gathered while hosting it. For additional information about Ultra Short Throw Showdown, along with a detailed breakdown of the judges' scorecard, be sure to check out Detailed UST Showdown Event Coverage on ProjectorScreen.com.

Brian and his team at ProjectorScreen set up eight identical screens in their new facility in New Jersey, allowing the judges to compare several popular ultra-short-throw projectors side by side. To ensure a level playing field, the room was outfitted with eight Spectra Projection Vantage 0.5-gain ambient-light-rejecting screens, all 100 inches in size.
These screens were chosen for their proven performance and affordability, making them a practical pairing for UST projectors. Spectra Projection Vantage is a lenticular screen, the most widely used UST screen technology, due to its wide viewing angle and ability to be manufactured in larger sizes.
The Spectra Projection Vantage screens are designed to accept light only from a steep angle below them and reject light from other directions, helping mitigate ambient light from other projectors in the room. In addition, black panels were placed between the screens to minimize the risk of a projector interfering with another projector's performance.
While UST projectors are capable of producing much larger image sizes than the 100” that we used, we were limited by space and time for this Showdown, since ProjectorScreen.com just moved into their new facility a couple of months ago and only had the single 1200 square foot Showroom space completed. Next year, we plan to use larger screens to showcase the massive images these projectors are capable of producing.
The projectors and screens were mounted on specialized carts. While most of the judging was conducted in a dark space, we also evaluated the projector’s image quality under moderate and high ambient lighting.
A calibrated 55" Samsung S90F QD-OLED TV was used as a consistent reference display, giving judges a stable benchmark for color accuracy, detail, and overall image integrity. Other supporting equipment included Kaleidescape media server, AVPro’s video distribution hardware, and Panasonic Blu-ray players. Projectors were connected via identical bullet train optical cables to ensure uniform signal quality.
To ensure that manufacturers did not provide golden, professionally tuned models that could sway voting, Brian was gracious enough to pull projectors from his current inventory. The goal was to ensure that the image quality the judge evaluated could be achieved in an average user’s home.
Each manufacturer was invited to Brian’s facility in New Jersey to make minor adjustments to their projectors before the event. The picture adjustments were limited to things that an average consumer could quickly do, utilizing readily available test patterns on the Internet or YouTube, such as Brightness, Contrast, Color Temperature, and Gamma. While users will still need to adjust brightness and contrast for their environment, we will share the recommended picture settings for each manufacturer, which we used during the competition.
During the event, no representatives from any manufacturers were present to prevent them from influencing the judge’s voting. Since I was hosting the event along with Brian, we both opted not to participate in the judging. However, I want to share my impression of the event, so this article provides an in-depth look at the event setup, judging criteria, performance evaluations, and standout projectors.
To help evaluate the lineup of ultra-short-throw projectors, Projector Reviews collaborated with Projector Screen to assemble a diverse panel of expert judges, including ISF-certified calibrators, professional reviewers, and video technology enthusiasts. Each of the six judges is well-regarded in the A/V industry. Several of the judges also participated in last year's Ultra Short Throw Showdown,






During the 2025 Ultra-Short Throw Projector Showdown, each projector was evaluated based on a comprehensive set of criteria designed to reflect real-world viewing experiences. Judges assessed performance in both SDR (Standard Dynamic Range) and HDR (High Dynamic Range) modes, focusing on attributes critical to image quality and usability in various environments. The judge’s scorecard was divided into SDR and HDR, each with several criteria.
One of the essential criteria for both HDR and SDR was color accuracy, which involved analyzing how closely the projector replicated natural colors, particularly skin tones. The ideal image maintained a neutral color temperature of 6500K, ensuring that colors appeared realistic and Skin tones appeared lifelike.
The judges observed that accurate HDR color reproduction does not directly correlate with accurate SDR colors, resulting in varying projector rankings across formats. Except for the Epson QS100, all competitors utilized some sort of tri-laser light source capable of displaying an extremely wide color gamut, which is beneficial when viewing HDR material. However, when watching SDR content on some RGB Laser-equipped projectors, bright colors appear oversaturated. The Judges noted that newer tri-laser UST projectors do a better job of displaying SDR colors than previous models.
The judges also spent a good amount of time evaluating visual contrast, which is a projector's ability to differentiate between the brightest whites and the darkest blacks in an image. This evaluation also included observing how effectively the projector displayed subtle gradations in brightness, contributing to a sense of depth and dimensionality.
We utilize SDR and HDR scenes to evaluate how well the projectors handle dark scenes. Judges looked for deep, inky blacks and clear visibility of fine textures or subtle details within shadows. These factors are essential for cinematic viewing experiences in dark environments, where insufficient black levels can make scenes appear washed out.
In addition to native contrast, factors such as laser dimming and video processing can significantly impact real-world performance. After the Showdown, we measured each projector’s max brightness and black level to determine its contrast ratio. We noticed that the projector that measured the best often didn’t deliver the best real-world contrast and black levels.
While none of these UST projectors could deliver the inky blacks of a premium Home Theater projector, they still delivered impressive picture quality. During the competition, the judges were advised to “grade on a curve,” so the units that performed best in a category got a “10.” So remember, a “10” in black level for a UST projector is not the same as a “10” on a premium LCOS-based Home Theater projector.
The ability to deliver high brightness is another essential factor. The ability to deliver vibrant images under ambient light is important since many UST projectors are used in non-light-controlled environments. Judges examined whether each projector could deliver a bright, vivid image, particularly in well-lit environments, without compromising color accuracy.
The overall brightness of the projector was another essential factor. The ability to deliver a vibrant image under ambient light is an important consideration, as many UST projectors are used in non-light-controlled environments. Judges examined whether each projector could deliver a bright, vivid image, particularly in well-lit environments, without compromising color accuracy.
Higher brightness also enhances the appearance of HDR colors. Just because a projector can reproduce 100% of the BT.2020 color gamut does not mean it can display all the color shades found in HDR content. Color volume is the combination of color gamut and brightness range, and one of the things that makes HDR look so much better than SDR is its massive amount of color volume. Brighter colors tend to appear more vibrant and saturated, which is why many judges preferred the look of HDR on the brighter projectors.
Most projectors produce enough brightness to accurately reproduce the information found in SDR content even on a large screen. However, even the brightest projector cannot display the full brightness range of HDR content, which is mastered for flat-panel displays, so good tone mapping is critical.
There are three key elements when it comes to achieving a good HDR tone mapping. The first is the ability to deliver deep blacks while still maintaining shadow detail. The second element is the ability to deliver good onscreen brightness, and the third is the ability to do all of this without blowing out bright highlight detail when viewing challenging HDR scenes.
The image's sharpness and detail were also critical components of the evaluation. Judges scrutinized the clarity of fine details across the screen, ensuring that the image was sharp not just in the center but also at the edges. A sharp image contributes to an immersive viewing experience, particularly with high-definition and 4K content.
For motion handling, the judges focused on the smoothness of playback for content shot at 24 frames per second (24p), which is the standard frame rate for most films. This involved evaluating whether the projectors could deliver a cinematic look without introducing judder or artificial smoothness caused by excessive motion interpolation. All the projectors in the Showdown had either a 24P mode or the ability to defeat unnecessary motion compensation. Since they all could accurately display 24p movie content, there was no need to include a motion ranking on the scorecard.
Lastly, Judges identified any distracting visual artifacts, such as DLP rainbows, laser speckle, chromatic aberration (color fringing), banding, or digital noise. These artifacts can significantly affect the viewing experience, particularly for those sensitive to them.
The judging panel spent a full day evaluating the majority of factors that home entertainment enthusiasts consider important for picture quality. The goal of the event is to provide a balanced assessment of each projector's strengths and weaknesses, offering valuable insights to potential buyers.
We would have liked to evaluate other things, such as sound quality, gaming performance, smart features, and installation flexibility, but since this was a one-day event, we didn't have the time. We realize that factors beyond picture quality need to be considered when purchasing a UST projector, so we encourage readers to check out our Ultra Short Reviews on ProjectorReviews.com, where we cover everything you need to know in detail.
After the event, the ranking of each projector was determined by summing the points in each category (SDR & HDR). To calculate a projector's "Total Point Score", the sum of the SDR and HDR categories is tabulated to determine "Total Point Rank". To select an "Overall Judges Pick," the judges were also asked to choose their top three overall choices, taking into account everything about the projector, including picture quality, design, and user interface.
Using ranked choice voting, 3 points were awarded for a #1 pick, 2 points for a #2 pick, and 1 point for a #3 pick. The projector tabulation of points was used to determine its ranked choice. The ProjectorScreen team also took the time to measure the brightness and native contrast of each projector. All the measurements and rankings are posted on a dedicated 2025 UST Showdown Page on ProjectorScreen,cpm
Before the event, I compiled a list of challenging SDR and HDR clips that were played back using the Kaleidescape Strato E and a Panasonic UB9000 Blu-ray player. The evaluations featured a curated list of movie scenes and test patterns. While we used some of the same demos as last year, we also included new ones. We will be share a complete list but below are some examples of the clips used and the tests they applied to:
Motion Handling
SDR Color Reproduction
Black Levels & Shadow Detail
HDR Performance & Tone Mapping
The HDR tests utilized HDR10 content, as all the projectors supported that format. While all the projectors except for the Epson QS100 support Dolby Vision, and many also support HDR10+. However, issues are sharing the same dynamic metadata found in these formats with multiple projectors. It is likely that the dynamic metadata found in Dolby Vision and HDR10+ will deliver a noticeable improvement in the HDR picture quality of some projectors.
The NexiGo Aurora Pro MKII is the follow-up to last year's Aurora Pro. While the MKII shares the same design as the previous model, the unit features a new ALPD 5.0 hybrid laser light engine that combines RGB lasers and LEDs. This new light source is designed to improve color reproduction while reducing laser speckle. The Nexigo Aurora Pro MKII features NexiGo’s proprietary Scene Adapt Engine (SAE) technology, which combines Dynamic Laser Dimming and a dynamic iris with frame-by-frame video processing, delivering deeper blacks and enhanced shadow detail.
I should note that the Nexigo was not included in the final scorecard due to an issue which I will explain later in the article.
While the Hisense PT1 is the least expensive ultra-short-throw tri-laser projector in Hisense’s lineup, it offers features and performance that rival many competitors’ flagship models. The projector can deliver 110% of the BT.2020 color space, and it also supports multiple HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+. The projector operates on the Google TV platform, providing access to popular streaming services and offering voice control via Google Assistant.
The Hisense L9Q is Hisense's flagship ultra-short-throw projector. The Hisense L9Q is positioned above the award-winning Hisense PX3-Pro, offering significantly higher brightness and a more advanced audio system. Its 5,000-lumen TriChroma laser engine provides stronger performance in rooms with ambient light and produces a more vibrant, punchy image on big screens.
The L9Q supports HDR10+ along with Dolby Vision, and it is IMAX Enhanced certified. The L9Q features a built-in 6.2.2-channel, 116-watt sound system co-developed with Devialet, which includes two subwoofers and dedicated upward-firing (height) speakers to create a true three-dimensional sound field.
The XGIMI Aura 2 is the new version of their UST projector, which utilizes the Google TV operating system. The projector’s stylish design makes it stand out from the competition. The Aura 2 utilizes XGIMI’s Dual Light 2.0 technology, which combines laser and LED light sources to achieve 2300 ISO lumens of brightness while displaying 99% of the DCI-P3 color gamut. The projector supports both IMAX Enhanced and Dolby Vision certifications, indicating a strong focus on delivering cinematic image quality. The Aura 2 also features several auto-setup options that dramatically simplify the setup process. Lastly, the judges agreed that the Aura 2 was the most attractive-looking projector in the Showdown.
The O2S Ultra packs a ton of performance and features into a compact package. It uses a version of JMGO's MALC 3.0 Triple Color Laser light source to deliver a rated brightness of 3,600 ANSI lumens while reproducing 110% of the BT.2020 color space, along with a respectable 1600:1 native contrast ratio. The O2S utilizes a Google TV operating system and supports Dolby Vision and 3D. Lastly, it is equipped with a high-quality sound system and includes several features that simplify setup.
The Hisense PX3-PRO dominated the previous year’s Showdown, winning several awards, so it made sense to include it in this year’s judging. The projector's Tri-laser light source has a rated brightness of 3,000 lumens, which, combined with a 3,000:1 native contrast ratio, delivers a vibrant HDR image. Notable features include support for IMAX Enhanced, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, as well as 4K AI upscaling and 3D video support.
The Formovie Theater Premium was one of the higher-rated projectors in the 2024 UST Showdown. With a currently selling price below $2800, we thought it would be a good idea to include it in this year's event so the judges could compare it with other projectors in its price point. Theater Permium features an ALPD 4.0 triple-laser that delivers 2200 lumens of brightness and reproduces 107% BT.2020 for accurate, vivid color. It supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+. Its Google TV operating system provides access to popular streaming services and thousands of other apps. It’s built-in Bowers & Wilkins sound system supports Dolby Atmos and DTS: X, for those who want to game. The Theater Premium offers low input lag (under 18 ms) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode).
The new QS100 and the older LS800 appear similar at first glance, but they are designed with distinctly different users in mind. The LS800 offered tons of smart features but limited image adjustments, which negatively impacted its ranking in last year’s showdown. Although it shares the LS800’s core imaging technology, the QS100 introduces a suite of performance enhancements, calibration tools, and system-integration features that make it a better choice for videophiles and custom installers. So, while the QS100 lacks smart features and a built-in sound system, it is brighter and offers extensive picture adjustments, which justify its place in this year’s UST showdown.

The evening before the event, an issue occurred with the unit (laser flickering, power issues, etc.). We replaced the unit with another one that was out of the Projector Screen’s stock and updated it to the latest firmware, as per NexiGo’s instructions. However, NexiGo did not mention that to ensure the firmware update is fully implemented, a factory reset is required.
During the event, several judges familiar with NexiGo noticed that the image did not match their previous experience with the unit. It was assumed that the visual difference was the result of the settings NexiGo had chosen for the competition. However, after lunch, when we factory reset all projectors for the Out of the Box judging, the NexiGo image quality seemed to improve,
The day after the event, when we reviewed the score sheets, it became apparent that there was an issue with the Aurora Pro MKII during the first half of the event. Its overall scores were surprisingly low, even in the HDR dark room tests, which is one of the projector’s known strengths.
Therefore, we decided not to include the Aurora Pro MKII on the final scorecard, as it would not be a fair representation of its true performance since the unit was not running the latest public firmware. We look forward to another opportunity to compare the Aurora Pro MKII to competitive UST models in the future. In the meantime, please check out our detailed product review and YouTube video review recap.

The 2025 Ultra-Short Throw Projector Showdown brought together a diverse lineup of projectors, each with unique strengths and weaknesses.

The PX3 Pro dominated last year’s showdown, and it is still widely available. This is why we decided to include the PX3 Pro in this year’s showdown, even though there were already two other Hisense projectors in the event. Many of the judges were curious to see how a top unit from last year’s showdown with fare would fare against the latest models from Hisense and other manufacturers.
Like last year, the PX3 Pro was one of the top performers. It impressed judges with its consistent performance across all evaluation criteria. The PX3 Pro excelled in both SDR and HDR testing. The judges were impressed with its ability to deliver balanced brightness, accurate color reproduction, and solid black levels. All the Hisense projectors, including the PX3 Pro, did a great job of tone mapping challenging HDR material.
As a result, the PX3 Pro scored near the top of every judge’s scorecard in nearly every category. So, while the projector didn't do everything perfectly, it did everything well. While it may not have been the absolute best in most categories, its well-rounded performance earned it the top spot in the competition.
Last year, Projector Reviews awarded the PX3 Pro, our Editor’s Choice, for ultra short throw projectors between $3000 and $4000. Now, the unit is available for under $3,000, making it a compelling option for those seeking top-tier performance in a UST projector.

The Formovie Theater Premium was included in the UST Showdown for the second year in a row. The Theater Premium did not disappoint, delivering excellent SDR and HDR image quality. Its HDR tone mapping was particularly effective, and the vibrant, oversaturated SDR colors appealed to judges, especially in well-lit environments.
The latest firmware eliminated the oversaturation of SDR colors that the judges observed during last year’s event. While Theater Premium was not the highest-scoring projector in any category, it consistently ranked among the better-performing models, making it a great value at its current selling price of $2499.

The XGIMI Aura chosen for the showdown was the second-generation model, which utilizes the Google TV operating system. While most projectors use a single or RGB laser light source, the Aura 2 features XGIMI’s proprietary hybrid dual-laser and LED light engine. Since this is a new unit, there were issues with the production firmware that prevented us from adjusting the projector’s picture settings.
While the out-of-the-box picture quality is good, this issue puts the XGIMI Aura 2 at a disadvantage compared to the other projectors, which were adjusted to optimize their performance. However, the projector struggled with some HDR10 content, especially in high-brightness scenes where detail loss and blown highlights were evident. While we didn’t test Dolby Vision, based on our experience from last year, utilizing content mastered in that format should deliver noticeable improvements in HDR image quality.
The Aura 2 GTV scored high in Install Flexibility due to its beautiful design. The design of the XGIMI Aura 2 projector is a masterclass in marrying minimalist elegance. One of the coolest features is its motorized lens cover, which elegantly unfurls when the unit is powered on. The unit’s clean lines and gentle profile allow the projector to sit discreetly in most environments. Its appearance, combined with its price, was one of the top picks in the Value projector category.

The main insight I got from this year’s showdown is that brightness is king. While many enthusiasts and reviewers focus on black-level and native contrast measurements when comparing projectors side-by-side, most people will gravitate toward the brighter image. While many people expressed disappointment with the projector’s native contrast measurements on several Enthusiast forums, the L9Q dominated the event.
I believe this is because the L9Q has a rated brightness of 5000 lumens, which is substantially more than most of the projectors in the Showdown. While 5000 lumens might seem like overkill on a 100-inch screen, the high brightness really makes HDR pop.
The new DCI standard for HDR projection specifies that an on-screen brightness of 300 nits is required to achieve optimal HDR performance. This is because colors displayed at higher brightness appear more saturated. Also, due to higher brightness, less aggressive tone mapping is needed for HDR content, so the picture is closer to the creator’s intent. To deliver this brightness on a large screen requires a lot of light output, which is why the Hisense L9Q and the Epson QS100 stood out from the crowd.
The HDR tone mapping and all the Hisense projectors at the showdown are outstanding. In addition, the L9Q did a good job of mapping the projector’s wide color gamut to accurately reproduce the Rec. 709 color space used in SDR content.
Yes, some projectors could deliver deeper black levels in super dark scenes from the Batman, and nope, but most judges chose the L9Q as your top Projector for both SDR and HDR. While the L9Q did not have the deepest black levels, its higher brightness gave it higher perceived contrast, which was the main reason many judges said its HDR image looked closest to the reference OLED display.
While L9Q is one of the most expensive ultra-short-throw projectors on the market, its high brightness, white color reproduction, and excellent video processing make it worth the premium for those seeking the best image quality.

Hisense is a leader in the ultra-short-throw projector market. They were one of the first manufacturers to introduce products in this category, and they continue to fine-tune their performance to stay ahead of the pack. Hisense also has the largest selection of UST projectors, which is why three Hisense models were in this year’s showdown.
The PT1 includes all of Hisense’s award-winning technologies in a more affordable package. It includes your proven RGB laser light source as well as their outstanding video processing and tone mapping.
The judges gave the PT1 high marks for its black-level color reproduction and overall SDR and HDR picture quality. The unit ranked high in value as well as dark room viewing, so if you are thinking about purchasing a projector to utilize in a dark space for under $3000, the PT one should definitely be considered.

The QS100 is not targeted at Projector Enthusiast looking for a projector to watch in a darkened Batcave. This projector is designed to deliver a bright, vivid image even in rooms with higher ambient light.
The QS100’s unique selling proposition is its high brightness and the ability of its three LCD imaging systems to deliver an equal amount of white and color lumens. Like the L9Q, its high brightness appealed to many judges, especially when viewing HDR content in low- and moderate-ambient-light conditions.
The QS100 was the only Projector not equipped with a tri laser light source. While the QS100 could not reproduce the insanely wide color gamut of the other projectors, due to its higher brightness, colors appeared vibrant and saturated when the lights were on.
While the two-axis pixel-shifted 1080P 3LCD panels could not deliver the same on-screen resolution as 4K DLP projectors in the showdown, the image was still sharper than full HD. The three LCD panels completely eliminates the rainbow effect common to DOP projectors that bothers some viewers.
The QS100’s high brightness and accurate color reproduction is why many judges would recommend the projector to those looking for a unit to utilize in a room with tons of ambient light.

The first thing that catches your eye about this Projector is how compact it is. The unit is so small that it is even packaged with a convenient carrying case. The O2S Ultra is equipped with JMGO’s proprietary tri-laser light source, which delivers outstanding brightness and vibrant images from a unit that can easily be moved from one location to another.
While some bright colors were oversaturated, the unit’s HDR and SDR performance was very good. The projector’s black levels were average, but under low ambient light, the difference between the projectors quickly disappears. The projector’s high brightness produced an image that pops in uncontrolled lighting conditions.
The 02S Ultra features a ton of smart features and a high-quality built-in sound system. The unit also offers extensive auto setup technologies that dramatically simplify installation, including an automatic wall warp correction feature.
After the event, a couple of the judges took the time to set up the unit on a bare wall, and it delivered an impressive picture. All the event attendees, including myself, were fascinated with how the O2S Ultra packs so much performance and features into such a small package. While the Projector didn’t win any performance categories, it was one of the most popular units at the event.
In fact, several of the judges expressed interest in reviewing the unit. I was even trying to convince Brian to let me bring his sample unit on my flight back to San Diego. In its case, the unit is literally small enough to toss in an airplane’s carry-on storage. If portability and install flexibility are high on your list, the 02S Ultra should be your top option.

The first thing many judges said when they entered the room was that this year’s evaluation process would be far more difficult than in previous years. This is because the color reproduction of many of the projectors has improved dramatically. Most offered good HDR tone mapping and enough brightness to be usable even in a room with low ambient light.
The Showdown Event space was not a totally blacked-out bat-cave, but we worked hard to keep the black floor as low as possible under the ambient light from the other projectors. This sacrifice was necessary so the judges could evaluate all the projectors at the same time, in the same room, without having to rely on memory. However, the ambient light level was low enough for the judges to easily see the differences in the black floor, shadow detail, and contrast between the units.
During the event, the judges tended to gravitate towards the brightest image with the most accurate color. This is why the L9Q did so well in the Showdown, even though it did not have the deepest black levels. The projector’s higher brightness produced greater perceived visual contrast, which is why the judges said it looked closest to the reference OLED display in most scenes.
While projectors with lower black levels should excel in absolute darkness, the judges prioritized overall picture quality and real-world versatility. These rewarding models maintained impactful images across a broader range of viewing environments. Yes, you could argue that the L9Q’s blacks weren’t as good as some of the other projectors when viewing super dark test scenes in Batman, but when viewing basically 90% of the SDR and HDR content you would watch daily, the benefit of the L9Q’s brightness and color capabilities is obvious.
For some attendees, design, simple setup, and install flexibility are just as important as picture quality. High Performance is meaningless if your significant other won’t allow you to place the unit in your living room.
