Sony VPL-VW1000ES
The first image is a slightly cropped shot of part of the map. (The projector for this first image, is the Sony)
There are two aspects here. As projectors go, or rather those with 3 panels (LCD and LCoS), tight alignment of the panels creates a sharper image lacking color separation at the pixel level. This Sony has an automated alignment system that works in increments of 10% of a pixel diameter. Looking at the structure close up, it's as least as good as any other projectors I've seen with panel alignment features, including other Sony projectors, the new Epsons, and others.
Then there's perceived sharpness. That takes us back to the whole 4K resolution abilities of this projector. First, the sharpness and clarity of true 4K is a major improvement over 1080p. Even, though, the upscaling makes a very visible difference. True, not as stunning a difference, but enough to provide a more detailed image than I've seen on any other projector, and it definitely appears sharper than those JVC's claiming 4K by "firing" a 2K panel twice, with a physical offset between the first and second firings (by 1/2 pixel diagonally).
This Sony on 2K content definitely is a step up from those JVC projectors, or for that matter any of the sharper 1080p projectors including single chip DLPs.
For your consideration, our usual close up images.
Now let's look at 2K to 4K upscaling:
For all comparison images below, I set my Canon 60D dSLR to full 18 megapixel resolution for all the Map, and Logo images when shooting both the JVC and Sony. The large images were, as usual cropped to 1000 pixels wide. Thanks to starting with the full 18 megapixels, there's plenty of resolution available to distinguish the performance of these two fine projectors.
I took some images of maps from the movie Hunt For Red October with Reality Creation. And I also shot them using the JVC X70R which does it's "4K" thing using pixel shifting.
The first image is a slightly cropped shot of part of the map. (The projector for this first image, is the Sony)
Remember: While the VW1000ES is a true 4K projector, the images you are looking at from the Sony are only 2K (Red October) upscaled to 4K. If we had the same content in true 4K, it would no doubt be considerably sharper still!
Throughout this review I've discussed the significant difference between having a true 4K engine, and JVC's "creating" 4K by doubling up on a 2K image.
Simply summarized, the JVC's methodology of 4K (which I'd rather they didn't call 4K), is no match for a true 4K projector, even if the content provided is only 2K. Yes, the JVC method does improve percieved sharpness over, a basic 2K projector, such as the less expensive DLA-X30 or twin, the RS45 (we reviewed the RS45), but NO, it's no match for a true 4K projector.
Discussing the Sony vs. the JVC with real 4K content, is a very short conversation, as the JVC simply has no ability to accept any 4K source, the Sony can, and it looks a whole lot sharper than even Sony's Reality Creation can do for 2K content. End of that conversation.