Greetings, Yes, projector owners, Our time has almost come. It is time for us to prepare, to consider, to plan our home theater - and home entertainment future. 4K is almost upon us, and 3D is being taken more and more seriously by more than a few of the greatest Directors out there. This conversation addresses both 4K - Ultra-HD, and 3D, and the impact of both together.
Let's consider that thought in terms of some of today's great directors, and consider who's directing 3D movies. Although I'm skipping most
of the directors of "mostly for kids" animated films, I will start with Lee Unkrich of Toy Story 3. If you didn't see it in 3D, you really didn't see it at its best. Want big names? Check these film directors:
The Hobbit - An Incredible 3D Movie Adventure
James Cameron, (Avatar, Titanic remake, etc.)
Peter Jackson (The Hobbit)
Martin Scorsese (Hugo)
Robert Zemekis (Beowulf, A Christmas Carol, The Polar Express)
Barry Sonnenfeld (Men In Black 3)
Spielberg (The Adventures of Tintin, he's also produced a significant number of 3D movies)
and some up and comers:
Sam Raimi (upcoming: Oz: The Great and Powerful - he wrote Back To the Future)
Baz Luhrmann (wrote Moulin Rouge, directing The Great Gatsby).
BTW I've seen a 3D trailer of The Great Gatsby, what a feast for the eyes, even if you disagree with my wife who thinks DiCaprio is gorgeous.
The only thing I can't figure out is what's holding Tarantino back from directing his first 3D movie. It seems so natural that he would. He's a known huge fan of 3D, and per iMDB (two years ago): Tarantino
has been a fan of 3D
movies for several years and wishes he had acquired the technology prior to the release of Kill Bill: Vol. 1. IMDB also said at the time, of Tarantino; "he's hinted he may use the technology for Kill Bill: Vol. 3
, which is due for release in 2014.
OK, have I convinced you that much of the real talent in Hollywood is into 3D (Hey, it's also rumored that we'll see some 3D that's Star Wars related from George Lucas.)
OK, enough name dropping of 3D directors (the full list, is huge).
When home theater projectors started appearing (Runco not withstanding), back at the beginning of the 21st Century
(wow, that sure "sounds" long ago and far away), the highest resolution source material we had to view was the standard DVD
. Compared to Blu-ray or HDTV, a standard DVD is a relatively pathetic 853x480 resolution. That's barely 1/6 the number of pixels we're used to with 1080p. If you have a 100" wide screen you could think of the resolution of DVD this way: 8.53 dots per inch. No wonder no one wanted to sit closer than 15+ feet away back then.
That said, Blu-ray and 1080p still have come up seriously short (for us projector folks) NOT watching on some tiny little 42", 55", or 65" LCDTV.
1080p on that same 100" wide screen is still only 19.2 DPI. (Think ink jet printers at 600 and 1200 dpi.) At least at 4K, one square inch (on a 100" wide screen) will have almost 1600 pixels in that square inch. Compared to slightly less than 400, at 1080p, and only about 70 at DVD resolution. All you metric folks out there, you can divide all these DPI numbers by approximately 6.45 to get the number of pixels per square centimeter.
In other words, when it comes to fully immersing yourself in a movie, or sports at 1080p (or 1080i) resolution, in order to not have too soft an image due to the "low resolution" of 1080p, you still have to sit pretty far back - let's say the equivalent of the back of a typical movie theater, perhaps a little closer than that, or further back still.
And that brings us to where we want to be sitting
. The reason hundreds of millions of people who own nice sized LCDTVs and Plasmas head to the the local Cineplex (movie theater) many times a year, is due to two reasons:
1: Some just can't wait 3 months until most titles come out on Blu-Ray, or can be downloaded.
2: The key one as far as I'm concerned:
Watching a movie on a 60" screen just isn't going to immerse you like going to the theater - you definitely do not have that "theater" experience. No cigar, three strikes, no joy. Sadness! For 100's of millions, movie or not, the only experience is still just "watching TV" not the excitement of a "movie premier".
What is the answer? Well for sure, 8K resolution would be great, but that will take probably 6 years. (For conversation purposes consider 2K and 1080p to be interchangeable terms, and also 4K and Ultra HD, to be interchangeable.) Ultra-HD is twice the pixels vertically and horizontally of 1080p: 3840x2160 (8.3 megapixels).
Since I just mentioned 8K, note that they are definitely experimenting with 8K over in Japan. Over here, though, the next great thing is Ultra-HD - 4K resolution. It's not perfect, but it's a much bigger jump in resolution than going from 720p to 1080p!
And it sure will work for me. Especially in 3D. Why? Because I do have a home theater - in most ways its better than any movie theater in good old California. (I could argue the advantages of Imax.) Oh, I recently visited the theaters for Django and Zero Dark Thirty, but also for the incredible The Hobbit, Life of Pi, and more.
Mostly I stick to Imax, because I really haven't been satisfied in any thing less. This is California - which probably fire safety laws demand so much ambient light, that, as I mentioned recently, the movies have no blacks. When viewing Les Miz, the black levels on the screen were inferior to watching any $999 home theater projector in a half way decent room with lights off. I think I put it about the equal of the black levels of the recently reviewed Epson Home Cinema 750HD (an entry level 3LCD 720p projector).
Oh, true, we have yet to be allowed to bring DCI color gamut to the home (soon we hope), so the theaters do have slightly more color range, but with all that ambient light forget appreciating that difference!
OK, where am I going with this? You home theater experience should blow away the local movie theaters.
But, then most of the digital theaters these days are using 4K projectors. So the size of the screen to your eyes, can be a lot larger in the theater, thanks to twice the resolution (horizontally and vertically). That is, you have to sit relatively "further back" at home (smaller perceived screen size), to maintain a sharp image.
With 4K, our home theaters will have parity with the movie theaters, and that can't happen too soon.
I like sitting about 1/3 to 1/2 back in a good movie theater. To get that much immersion in my home with a projector, on my 124" diagonal 2.35:1 (wide) screen, as sitting 1/3 back, I need roughly to sit about 6-8 feet back. As it stands, with 2K (1080p), at 10 feet back, in my theater, the screen still appears smaller than I would like it to appear, but I'm already just shy of the point where pixels are becoming visible on normal content.
Give me 4K - Ultra-HD, and 6 feet back becomes viable. at 8 feet, the term should be razor sharp, on a screen my size at 4K. Note, time perhaps to convince Stewart, SI, Da-Lite, Elite, Draper, etc. to commit to offering us affordable curved screens!
And that brings us back to 3D. I am a 3D fanatic. (root word: fan) 3D is not a gimmick.
If you remember nothing else from this article: Please, try to remember that about the only things humans do on this planet that isn't in 3D is read, write, and watch movies and TV. The rest of our lives are in 3D
. Off topic: Anyone out there dream in 3D? (Sadly, I don't remember my dreams.)
You will get to know 3D, it will not go away. Every year, more and more blockbusters are in 3D, and for the movie snobs among us (no offense) not just blockbusters, more and more great movies too. The kind that do win Best Picture, Best Actor... Perhaps some one should wonder if some great blockbusters would have been great without 3D (Avatar comes to mind, Hugo, I think made an excellent 2D movie, but pales compared to the 3D version.)
Why, because it's not a gimmick, it more closely resembles reality.
People 3D is not what you see the first 5 minutes you have the glasses on. In most cases, that's when you are going, "wow, 3D is cool" or "look at that" or "this is weird" (for those not fans).
Folks it's about the next 2 or 3 hours of 3D, when unless it's a kids 3D movie where the director is intentionally throwing 3D effects at you, that you forget that you are watching 3D. Instead you are watching the movie, you are viewing and listening to the story, as it should be. With real depth. Things just are more natural. More REAL, more believable.
And that's true as long as 3D isn't being treated as a gimmick by the director.
I can't imagine watching a great or even good movie in 2D after seeing it on Imax, or in my home theater, in 3D. It would be like stripping away the color, or maybe more like reducing the color saturation so that bright colors are instead pale.
Giving up great 3D is like taking the life out of a picture. No, it's not going to change the story, but great 3D will make "suspending disbelief a whole lot easier. You will be more immersed in the world you are watching, and your brain (once used to 3D) will make everything more intense, believable.
Again, we're talking serious 3D, not gimmicky Captain EO, or Journey to the Center of the Earth, putting objects 6 inches from you nose (so your eyes go cross-eyed).
So, projector fans, our time is fast approaching. In another year or two, many of us will have taken advantage - viewing true 4K (not gimmicks there either), on 3D content. (or so we can only hope).
It really pleases me to think of viewing the beauty of Life of Pi in 4K 3D from 6-7 feet back from my 124" screen in a pitch black home theater, or viewing the in-your-face action, and world building, and story of The Hobbit in 4K 3D. That experience should have us wondering, in just a few years, how we survived in a world where 1080p and 2D was king. It's like looking back from 1080p to that old DVD with WVGA resolution, and pixels bigger than BBs, 1080p will be that same type of dinosaur, an important footnote in history, but not anything we'd want to actually have to suffer through. (OK, I am getting carried away.)
And of course, 8K will follow 4K. If only we could speed up the clock of change.
I am speaking from experience. As noted, I did get to view a few things 3D and 4K in my theater, - including the trailer for Spiderman, on the true 4K Sony VPL-VW1000ES projector. Thank you Sony, for sending me a server with such content, with the projector.
I'm done "waxing eloquent" (a phrase I don't think I've ever used before, but always admired), about the future. But for those of you who so far have considered 3D a toy, or just "have no interest". I ask only that you keep an open mind. I'd hate to see you left behind. Donot miss the 3D worlds you will be able to view in the future in your home They should be far better, for the naturalness of 3D, and for the improved resolution that will allow us to have a large enough field of view to be as fully immersed as possible.
Geez, after writing all of this, I think I better catch The Hobbit one more time in an IMAX 3D theater if I can still find one still showing it... (I just looked, nearest 3D IMAX that still has it, is 50 miles away. Darn, will have to ask Sony to send the VW1000ES back when they release the Hobbit in 3D.
My only complaint - all of this won't be available, and affordable soon enough.
That said, I'd be really surprised if you can't buy a really good true 4K, 3D home theater projector for $5K two years from now.
Maybe even a good bit less? Afterall, it's more about getting those 4K LCD, LCoS and DLP chips on the street, than it is about 3D, since most of all new home projectors over $1500 seem to be 3D.
PS This particular blog was inspired by another blog I read the other day by Andrew Robinson, a hardware reviewer (audio and video...), and independent film director. I had to comment on a point or two, as I think Andrew was writing with more of an LCDTV slant than from our home theater projector vantage. I think he fears people will be watching their 4K LCDTVs from 2 feet away. Check his blog out by clicking here
PPS. This turned out way to long for a blog. I will be re-editing this piece into a main article (or perhaps two) on the projectorreviews.com website, and likely shorten this blog to something reasonable, more to the point, and point readers to the larger article for those willing to put up with my ramblings.
PPPS. Don't forget - our next two home theater reviews: JVC DLA-X95R (aka DLA-RS66U from the other JVC division), and the Mitsubishi HC8000D.