Posted on August 2, 2011 By Art Feierman
Same as the RS25, of course.
Very nice. Post calibration the skin tones on this Optoma are expecially impressive. Some of the best I’ve seen. I still hold the InFocus IN83 in awe, in this regard, but the HD8600 comes close. At the time I wrote it, I also mentioned, that at the moment, I even slightly preferred the HD8600’s skin tones to my RS20s. For clarification, my RS20 was calibrated when the lamp was almost brand new. With about 800 hours on it by the time I was watching the HD8600, colors had shifted, however slightly, due to the lamp aging.
Remember, we found the PD8150 to be one of the very best in terms of accuracy, out of the box (last year -art). Relating to skin tones, my comment in the review: “After calibration, the image was even better, removing almost all of the slight shift towards red. The end result was excellent handling of skin tones, as the images below show…”
I really liked this Sony, but for a touch of red: It’s those reds, darn! Despite that small extra touch of reds evident in most skin tones, I’d say skin tones look extremely good. Understand how we work here. Mike takes the projectors and calibrates them. Very slight differences in how a calibrator approach things give slightly different results. While, for example, the color temp numbers are right on, slightly different individual color settings will provide similar, but different final tonal balance.
The Vivitek really did a great job: Once calibrated skin tones turn out to be excellent. I didn’t say much more about them, rather spent most of the wordage trying to explain why a projector with great color has one of the worst looking sets of photos, in the review. I do believe something about the LED light source is driving my camera crazy, but it looks great on the screen.
In this section, I’ll discuss the combination of black level performance and shadow detail as one. Overall, some of these projectors do a little better (after normal adjustment), than others, in terms of shadow detail. That said, I consider those differences to be rather minor. Of far greater concern, is the black level performance. Often, after calibration, it is the black level performance that really separates these projectors from each other, far more so than other attributes. Thus – to a large degree, great black levels continues to be the quest for the “holy grail” of projector performance. Note, for those of you not familiar, the old CRT home theater projectors (from years ago), due to CRT technology, do essentially perfect black levels. All these fixed display projectors (3LCD, DLP, LCoS), by comparison, cannot produce a true black, so the quest to get as close as possible, still dominates home theater projector design.
I’ll be referring to what I call “ultra-high-contrast” projectors quite a bit in this section, so a quick warning: I’ll start referring to those as UHC projectors from time to time, to save keystrokes.
Only two of the projectors in this group qualify as what I refer to as “ultra-high-contrast” projectors. The Panasonic, an LCD projector, and, the Sharp XV-Z15000 a DLP projector. The Panasonic does have the best blacks and very good shadow detail, compared to other projectors in this class.
Below from the Stargaze HD disc, with the PT-AE4000 projector.
The BenQ had perfectly good shadow detail, and the worst black levels of the 10 projectors in this class. Let’s face it, the BenQ is also the brightest projector in the report this year. The BenQ W1000 breed of projector is going to be found hanging around in family rooms and bonus rooms. The presumption is you need all those 2000+ lumens because you’ve got to deal with some real, ambient light. While better black levels are always a good thing, and provide a better picture, when there’s a decent amount of ambient light present, it’s going to negate almost all of the advantage of a projector with much better blacks. In other words, if you are using this as expected, the black levels are acceptable.
Epson certainly cranked up the spec on the contrast, so everyone was expecting a substantial improvement in blacks. Turns out they only improved slightly since all the improvement was from the dynamic iris. Ultimately, this year’s 8100 can do a slightly blacker black on the darkest scenes, but there’s no noticeable change in most mixed scenes. That said, the 8100’s black level performance, is very good, but still a little shy of being a UHC (ultra-high contrast) projector. The Epson is easily superior to projectors like the low cost DLPs as well as the Sanyo PLV-Z700, the Samsung, and probably a little better than the Viewsonic. On the other hand, it definitely still comes up short of the true UHC Panasonic PT-AE4000
Epson’s never been great on dark shadow detail. Seems they always lose a tiny bit. Well, that helps give their image all that pop and wow, but the Epson Home Cinema 8100, ultimately, comes up a bit short of most of these other projectors, in regard to shadow detail.
© 2019 Projector Reviews (V0625)